Innovating Works
SESAR-IR-VLD-WAVE2-06-2019
PJ.07 W2 Optimised airspace users operations
Specific Challenge:The current ATM environment based on static flight plans is evolving towards a trajectory based environment in order to improve airports and ATM network performance. Airspace users’ (AU) decision processes and resulting business priorities differ from AU to AU and from flight to flight within one AU. The trajectory development and management processes in ATM currently do not allow each individual user to incorporate specific aircraft/flight priorities into the requested trajectory, and respect any constraint in a way that best meets the business priorities. Similarly, OAT flight plans are not harmonised at European level and information is not disseminated into the network, this induces a lack of awareness about military traffic intentions that can impact ATM network performance (including safety), a lack of flexibility in the definition of cross-borders exercises and limitations in terms of interoperability. Irregular operations impose unplanned/additional cost on airlines and have a huge impact on airlines’ annual costs and revenue. Today the ATM system allows little flexibility to airspace users (e.g. ATFM slot swapping process). Airspace users’ full participation through their flight operations centres (FOC/WOC) into ATM collaborative processes, including flights’ prioritisation with the full user driven prioritisation process (UDPP), is essential to minimise impacts of deteriorated operations for all stakeholders including airspace users. A better recovery process that should offer more flexibility to accommodate AUs’ changing business priorities and equity in the ATM system. The collaborative planning and flight execution processes shall be performed at ‘level playing field’, i.e. performance of all actors is taken into consideration. Rules must be implemented in case no collaborative planning is possible.
Sólo fondo perdido 0 €
European
This call is closed This line is already closed so you can't apply. It closed last day 16-04-2019.
An upcoming call for this aid is expected, the exact start date of call is not yet clear.
Luckily, we have achieved the list of financed projects!
Presentation: Consortium Consortium: Esta ayuda está diseñada para aplicar a ella en formato consorcio.
Minimum number of participants.
This aid finances Proyectos: project objective:

Specific Challenge:The current ATM environment based on static flight plans is evolving towards a trajectory based environment in order to improve airports and ATM network performance. Airspace users’ (AU) decision processes and resulting business priorities differ from AU to AU and from flight to flight within one AU. The trajectory development and management processes in ATM currently do not allow each individual user to incorporate specific aircraft/flight priorities into the requested trajectory, and respect any constraint in a way that best meets the business priorities. Similarly, OAT flight plans are not harmonised at European level and information is not disseminated into the network, this induces a lack of awareness about military traffic intentions that can impact ATM network performance (including safety), a lack of flexibility in the definition of cross-borders exercises and limitations in terms of interoperability. Irregular operations impose unplanned/additional cost on airlines and have a huge impact on airlines’ annual costs and revenue. Today the ATM system allows little flexibility to airspace users (e.g. ATFM slot swapping process). Airspace users’ full participa... see more

Specific Challenge:The current ATM environment based on static flight plans is evolving towards a trajectory based environment in order to improve airports and ATM network performance. Airspace users’ (AU) decision processes and resulting business priorities differ from AU to AU and from flight to flight within one AU. The trajectory development and management processes in ATM currently do not allow each individual user to incorporate specific aircraft/flight priorities into the requested trajectory, and respect any constraint in a way that best meets the business priorities. Similarly, OAT flight plans are not harmonised at European level and information is not disseminated into the network, this induces a lack of awareness about military traffic intentions that can impact ATM network performance (including safety), a lack of flexibility in the definition of cross-borders exercises and limitations in terms of interoperability. Irregular operations impose unplanned/additional cost on airlines and have a huge impact on airlines’ annual costs and revenue. Today the ATM system allows little flexibility to airspace users (e.g. ATFM slot swapping process). Airspace users’ full participation through their flight operations centres (FOC/WOC) into ATM collaborative processes, including flights’ prioritisation with the full user driven prioritisation process (UDPP), is essential to minimise impacts of deteriorated operations for all stakeholders including airspace users. A better recovery process that should offer more flexibility to accommodate AUs’ changing business priorities and equity in the ATM system. The collaborative planning and flight execution processes shall be performed at ‘level playing field’, i.e. performance of all actors is taken into consideration. Rules must be implemented in case no collaborative planning is possible.


Scope:The topic ‘Optimised airspace users operations’ covers the following candidate SESAR Solutions:

Solution PJ.07-W2-38 Enhanced integration of AU trajectory definition and network management processes. The objective of this solution is to reduce the impact of ATM planning on Airspace Users’ costs of operations, by providing them a better access to ATM resource management and allowing them to better cope with ATM constraints. The solution shall improve Airspace Users flight planning and network management through improved FOC participation into the ATM network collaborative processes in the context of FF-ICE and its potential evolutions.

Solution PJ.07-W2-40 Mission trajectories management with integrated Dynamic Mobile Areas Type 1 and Type 2. The objective of the solution is to improve the use of airspace capacity for both civil and military users and the efficiency of airspace management by introducing more automation and increased flexibility in the civil-military coordination. The solution delivers improvements to the planning phase of the mission trajectory, including the connection of MT management with the booking of ARES (in the context of this solution DMA Type 1 and Type 2), for which the WOC will be the key actor. The coordination between WOC and regional NM is a key element for this solution.

Solution PJ.07-W2-39 Collaborative framework managing delay constraints on arrivals. The solution develops a collaborative framework that will enable the integration and necessary coordination of 4D constraints from various stakeholders (airports, ANSPs, AUs and NM). This will ensure the continued stability and performance of the network and will give the opportunity to the Airspace Users to prioritize their most important flights hence reducing the impact of ATM planning constraints on the costs of their operations. The solution will streamline all prioritisation processes occurring in the planning phase from all stakeholders concerned on arrivals.


Expected Impact:This project will develop solutions that are expected to have a positive impact on the Network improving:

Increased capacity based on a better integration of the AUs trajectory definition and the network demand and capacity functionIncreased flexibility by allowing the airspace users to recommend to the network management function a priority order for flights;Environmental sustainability - fuel efficiency thanks to the use of the preferred trajectory taking into consideration the Airspace users needs;Increased punctuality and predictability of individual flights thanks to the collaborative framework of the trajectory management.
see less

Temáticas Obligatorias del proyecto: Temática principal: OVA Overall ATM Air Traffic Management ATM Aircraft Avionics Systems & Equipment AVS Air Traffic control Transport Aviation / Air traffic management (ATM)

Consortium characteristics

Scope European : The aid is European, you can apply to this line any company that is part of the European Community.
Tipo y tamaño de organizaciones: The necessary consortium design for the processing of this aid needs:

characteristics of the Proyecto

Requisitos de diseño por participante: Duración:
Requisitos técnicos: Specific Challenge:The current ATM environment based on static flight plans is evolving towards a trajectory based environment in order to improve airports and ATM network performance. Airspace users’ (AU) decision processes and resulting business priorities differ from AU to AU and from flight to flight within one AU. The trajectory development and management processes in ATM currently do not allow each individual user to incorporate specific aircraft/flight priorities into the requested trajectory, and respect any constraint in a way that best meets the business priorities. Similarly, OAT flight plans are not harmonised at European level and information is not disseminated into the network, this induces a lack of awareness about military traffic intentions that can impact ATM network performance (including safety), a lack of flexibility in the definition of cross-borders exercises and limitations in terms of interoperability. Irregular operations impose unplanned/additional cost on airlines and have a huge impact on airlines’ annual costs and revenue. Today the ATM system allows little flexibility to airspace users (e.g. ATFM slot swapping process). Airspace users’ full participation through their flight operations centres (FOC/WOC) into ATM collaborative processes, including flights’ prioritisation with the full user driven prioritisation process (UDPP), is essential to minimise impacts of deteriorated operations for all stakeholders including airspace users. A better reco... Specific Challenge:The current ATM environment based on static flight plans is evolving towards a trajectory based environment in order to improve airports and ATM network performance. Airspace users’ (AU) decision processes and resulting business priorities differ from AU to AU and from flight to flight within one AU. The trajectory development and management processes in ATM currently do not allow each individual user to incorporate specific aircraft/flight priorities into the requested trajectory, and respect any constraint in a way that best meets the business priorities. Similarly, OAT flight plans are not harmonised at European level and information is not disseminated into the network, this induces a lack of awareness about military traffic intentions that can impact ATM network performance (including safety), a lack of flexibility in the definition of cross-borders exercises and limitations in terms of interoperability. Irregular operations impose unplanned/additional cost on airlines and have a huge impact on airlines’ annual costs and revenue. Today the ATM system allows little flexibility to airspace users (e.g. ATFM slot swapping process). Airspace users’ full participation through their flight operations centres (FOC/WOC) into ATM collaborative processes, including flights’ prioritisation with the full user driven prioritisation process (UDPP), is essential to minimise impacts of deteriorated operations for all stakeholders including airspace users. A better recovery process that should offer more flexibility to accommodate AUs’ changing business priorities and equity in the ATM system. The collaborative planning and flight execution processes shall be performed at ‘level playing field’, i.e. performance of all actors is taken into consideration. Rules must be implemented in case no collaborative planning is possible.
Do you want examples? Puedes consultar aquí los últimos proyectos conocidos financiados por esta línea, sus tecnologías, sus presupuestos y sus compañías.
Financial Chapters: The chapters of financing expenses for this line are:
Personnel costs.
Los costes de personal subvencionables cubren las horas de trabajo efectivo de las personas directamente dedicadas a la ejecución de la acción. Los propietarios de pequeñas y medianas empresas que no perciban salario y otras personas físicas que no perciban salario podrán imputar los costes de personal sobre la base de una escala de costes unitarios
Purchase costs.
Los otros costes directos se dividen en los siguientes apartados: Viajes, amortizaciones, equipamiento y otros bienes y servicios. Se financia la amortización de equipos, permitiendo incluir la amortización de equipos adquiridos antes del proyecto si se registra durante su ejecución. En el apartado de otros bienes y servicios se incluyen los diferentes bienes y servicios comprados por los beneficiarios a proveedores externos para poder llevar a cabo sus tareas
Subcontracting costs.
La subcontratación en ayudas europeas no debe tratarse del core de actividades de I+D del proyecto. El contratista debe ser seleccionado por el beneficiario de acuerdo con el principio de mejor relación calidad-precio bajo las condiciones de transparencia e igualdad (en ningún caso consistirá en solicitar menos de 3 ofertas). En el caso de entidades públicas, para la subcontratación se deberán de seguir las leyes que rijan en el país al que pertenezca el contratante
Madurez tecnológica: The processing of this aid requires a minimum technological level in the project of TRL 5:. Los elementos básicos de la innovación son integrados de manera que la configuración final es similar a su aplicación final, es decir que está listo para ser usado en la simulación de un entorno real. Se mejoran los modelos tanto técnicos como económicos del diseño inicial, se ha identificado adicionalmente aspectos de seguridad, limitaciones ambiéntales y/o regulatorios entre otros. + info.
TRL esperado:

Characteristics of financing

Intensidad de la ayuda: Sólo fondo perdido + info
Lost Fund:
 1.   List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in Annex A of the H2020 Work Programme and in the SJU Single Programming Document 2019-2021.
     
2.   Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in Annex B and Annex C of the H2020 Work Programme and in the SJU Single Programming Document 2019-2021.
 
Please note that this Call for Proposals is restricted to the Members of the SJU listed in ADB decision ref. ADB(D)02-2016 dated 9th March 2016 and which signed SJU Membership Agreement ref. SJU/LC/307-CTR.
 
     Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the SJU proposal template in the electronic submission system.
 
3.   Evaluation:
Evaluation criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in the SJU Single Programming Document 2019-2021.
Submission and evaluation processes are described in the Online Manual.
 
4.   Indicative time for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
 
5.   Provisions, proposal templates and model grant agreements (MGA):
 
S...
 1.   List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in Annex A of the H2020 Work Programme and in the SJU Single Programming Document 2019-2021.
     
2.   Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in Annex B and Annex C of the H2020 Work Programme and in the SJU Single Programming Document 2019-2021.
 
Please note that this Call for Proposals is restricted to the Members of the SJU listed in ADB decision ref. ADB(D)02-2016 dated 9th March 2016 and which signed SJU Membership Agreement ref. SJU/LC/307-CTR.
 
     Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the SJU proposal template in the electronic submission system.
 
3.   Evaluation:
Evaluation criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in the SJU Single Programming Document 2019-2021.
Submission and evaluation processes are described in the Online Manual.
 
4.   Indicative time for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
 
5.   Provisions, proposal templates and model grant agreements (MGA):
 
SESAR JU Research and Innovation Action (SESAR-RIA)
- Specific provisions and funding rates are described in the SJU Single Programming Document 2019-2021.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below. Applicants are invited to fill the Wave 2 STELLAR Initiation Template Excel file that contains a dedicated tab for each Object that characterizes the project.
SESAR JU MGAM - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
 
6.   Additional provisions:
      Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
      Classified information
      Technology readiness levels (TRL)
 
Due to the existence of other partnering arrangements at the SJU Membership level, applicants are not required to conclude a Consortium Agreement in order to answer to this call, as per Article 24 (2) of the Rules of Participation and SJU Single Programming Document 2019-2021.
 
7.   Open access to research data and specific publications
IR projects and VLD activities under this call for proposals will opt out of the provisions of the H2020 Work Programme 2018-2020 Part 19. General Annexes section L. ‘Conditions related to open access to Research Data’.
Please refer to the SJU Single Programming Document 2019-2021.
 
8.   SJU additional documents
Please read carefully all documents below before the preparation of your application. The key reference documents below set out the purpose and scope of the IR/VLD Wave 2 Call for Proposals and describe the activities that will be implemented via the resulting Grant Agreements as well as the conditions for participation and award.
SJU Single Programming Document 2019-2021
IR/VLD WAVE 2 Call Technical Specifications
Project Handbook (Execution Guidance)
Extended Release Strategy 2018
ATM Master Plan
H2020 Regulation of Establishment
H2020 Rules for Participation
H2020 Specific Programme
Guarantees:
does not require guarantees
No existen condiciones financieras para el beneficiario.

Additional information about the call

incentive effect: Esta ayuda tiene efecto incentivador, por lo que el proyecto no puede haberse iniciado antes de la presentación de la solicitud de ayuda. + info.
Respuesta Organismo: Se calcula que aproximadamente, la respuesta del organismo una vez tramitada la ayuda es de:
Meses de respuesta:
Muy Competitiva:
non -competitive competitive Very competitive
We do not know the total budget of the line
minimis: Esta línea de financiación NO considera una “ayuda de minimis”. You can consult the regulations here.

other advantages

SME seal: Tramitar esta ayuda con éxito permite conseguir el sello de calidad de “sello pyme innovadora”. Que permite ciertas ventajas fiscales.
H2020-SESAR-2019-1 PJ.07 W2 Optimised airspace users operations Specific Challenge:The current ATM environment based on static flight plans is evolving towards a trajectory based environment in order to i...
Sin info.
SESAR-IR-VLD-WAVE2-01-2019 PJ.19 W2 Content Integration, Performance Management and Business Case Development
en consorcio: Specific Challenge:The research, development and validation activities require guidance and steering to achieve the objectives of the Master...
Cerrada does 6 years | next call scheduled for the month of
SESAR-IR-VLD-WAVE2-07-2019 PJ.09 W2 Digital Network Management Services
en consorcio: Specific Challenge:Today, air traffic flow and capacity management (ATFCM), airspace management (ASM) and air traffic control (ATC) are stil...
Cerrada does 6 years | next call scheduled for the month of
SESAR-IR-VLD-WAVE2-09-2019 PJ.18 W2 4D skyways
en consorcio: Specific Challenge:The SESAR concept is based upon the fundamental element of trajectory sharing. The ultimate goal is a trajectory based AT...
Cerrada does 6 years | next call scheduled for the month of
SESAR-IR-VLD-WAVE2-16-2019 VLD.03 W2 Improving runway throughput in one airport
en consorcio: Specific Challenge:At capacity constrained airports traffic demand for runway operations exceeds the runway capacity. With the growth in air...
Cerrada does 6 years | next call scheduled for the month of
SESAR-IR-VLD-WAVE2-11-2019 PJ.13 W2 IFR RPAS
en consorcio: Specific Challenge:The number of remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) is continuously increasing and this will imply higher interactions...
Cerrada does 6 years | next call scheduled for the month of