Innovating Works
BBI.2018.SO1.D2
BBI.2018.SO1.D2: Find solutions to dilution, pollution and content diversity challenges to turn mixed urban bio-waste (1) into sustainable feedstock for the bio-based industry
Specific Challenge:In 2016, an estimated 54 % of the world’s population lived in urban areas. That figure is projected to exceed 60 % in 20302. Cities, and the people living within them, produce an immense amount of solid waste and wastewater.
Sólo fondo perdido 0 €
Europeo
Esta convocatoria está cerrada Esta línea ya está cerrada por lo que no puedes aplicar. Cerró el pasado día 06-09-2018.
Se espera una próxima convocatoria para esta ayuda, aún no está clara la fecha exacta de inicio de convocatoria.
Por suerte, hemos conseguido la lista de proyectos financiados!
Presentación: Consorcio Consorcio: Esta ayuda está diseñada para aplicar a ella en formato consorcio.
Número mínimo de participantes.
Esta ayuda financia Proyectos: Objetivo del proyecto:

Specific Challenge:In 2016, an estimated 54 % of the world’s population lived in urban areas. That figure is projected to exceed 60 % in 20302. Cities, and the people living within them, produce an immense amount of solid waste and wastewater.

Despite the widespread availability of sorting practices, mixed waste streams going to landfill or for incineration still contain a large volume of biodegradable organic matter (for example, 60 % in the UK3) that could well be used as feedstock for the bio-based industry. Furthermore, such a large amount of organic matter going to landfill falls short of the aim in Council Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste4 of limiting the share of landfilled biodegradable waste to 35 % by 2020.

Wastewater contains several valuable components, including cellulose and nutrients, especially phosphorus. The content of municipal wastewater and the derived sewage sludge could cover around 15 % of the world’s phosphorus demand5. Every year the average citizen sends 10 kg of toilet paper6 into the sewage system. This would provide an enormous source of cellulose for further upgrade to chemical precursors and/or polymers.
<... ver más

Specific Challenge:In 2016, an estimated 54 % of the world’s population lived in urban areas. That figure is projected to exceed 60 % in 20302. Cities, and the people living within them, produce an immense amount of solid waste and wastewater.

Despite the widespread availability of sorting practices, mixed waste streams going to landfill or for incineration still contain a large volume of biodegradable organic matter (for example, 60 % in the UK3) that could well be used as feedstock for the bio-based industry. Furthermore, such a large amount of organic matter going to landfill falls short of the aim in Council Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste4 of limiting the share of landfilled biodegradable waste to 35 % by 2020.

Wastewater contains several valuable components, including cellulose and nutrients, especially phosphorus. The content of municipal wastewater and the derived sewage sludge could cover around 15 % of the world’s phosphorus demand5. Every year the average citizen sends 10 kg of toilet paper6 into the sewage system. This would provide an enormous source of cellulose for further upgrade to chemical precursors and/or polymers.

High dilution and the wide variety of exploitable components in urban wastewater streams make it difficult to recover usable components at higher scale efficiently. As a result, urban wastewater treatment tends to focus on producing energy or biogas.

Even though their contaminant levels and diversity present challenges for valorisation, organic urban waste streams can provide a significant volume of feedstock for the bio-based industry all year round without any conflict with land use and food production.

The specific challenge of this topic is to utilise mixed waste streams, separately collected organic waste and the organic fraction of sewage sludge from wastewater treatment – all coming from urban sources – as sustainable feedstock for the bio-based industry, overcoming their high dilution level, pollution and disparity of content.

1‘Urban bio-waste’: biodegradable garden and park waste, food and kitchen waste from households, restaurants, caterers and retail premises and comparable waste from food processing plants (definition of 'biowaste' in Directive 98/2008/EC on waste); urban waste water and sludge from its treatment

2http://www.metsatissue.com/en/media/Wash_Your_Hand_And_Stay_Healthy/Pages/default.aspxhttp://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/urbanization/the_worlds_cities_in_2016_data_booklet.pdf

3http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52010SC0577&amp;from=EN

4http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:31999L0031

5http://p-rex.eu/uploads/media/P-REX_Policy_Brief_final.pdf

6 See for instance: http://www.metsatissue.com/en/media/Wash_Your_Hand_And_Stay_Healthy/Pages/default.aspxhttp://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/urbanization/the_worlds_cities_in_2016_data_booklet.pdf


Scope:Demonstrate effective, safe and efficient solutions to overcome dilution, pollution and diversity of content in different organic urban waste streams of urban origin and convert these into high value-added compounds for further use. These streams include mixed waste streams, separately collected organic waste, and the organic fraction of sewage sludge from wastewater treatment.

The scope is to tackle all constraints which today impede the conversion of such waste streams into chemical precursors, polymers, materials and/or fertilisers at yields that are promising for successful upscaling to pre-commercial levels. Energy or biogas valorisation is out of scope (see related paragraph below).

A cascade-type approach should be applied, aiming at valorising as much as possible of the target feedstock into a range of several products and materials. A flexible biorefinery concept should also be developed, to allow for the production of different end-products, depending on feedstock availability and features, seasonality, market demand, etc.

Proposals should address urban wastewater, separately collected organic waste, mixed solid municipal waste streams, or a combination thereof. They should focus on the technologies needed in processing target waste streams. Logistical steps and other arrangements with and within municipalities, while instrumental to the success of the project, must be considered as ‘additional activities’. Proposals should demonstrate the efficient preparation of mixed urban waste streams for valorisation into high value-added compounds. The successful application of these technologies should deliver biomass feedstock that can readily be further treated and produce large volumes of the desired compounds.

Proposals should also assess the technical feasibility and economics of wastewater containment systems to reduce leakage of for example methane. This assessment should also include high-volume filtration systems for the removal of useful chemical feedstocks such as phosphates.

Proposals should build on and seek to dovetail with the results from other finished or running projects that address the treatment of wastewaters and organic waste streams. Technologies used for the conversion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and/or wastewater should be different and new compared to those applied in the running projects1.

Although energy or biogas valorisation is out of the main scope of the topic, proposals could seek cooperation with existing waste2 and/or wastewater treatment plants including biogas reactors, targeting compounds and products that exceed state-of-the-art standards.

Proposals should involve waste management companies/agencies to ensure the availability of the appropriate urban waste streams. In addition, as they are aiming to create or improve value chains based on urban waste streams, proposals should involve end-users so that they can address public perception.

Proposals should be based on a sound business case and business plan, as well as an assessment of the market potential of the new compounds.

Proposals should commit to assessing the environmental and economic impacts of the developed products or processes, using LCA methodologies based on available standards, certification, accepted and validated approaches3 (see introduction – section 2.2.5 - published in the BBI JU AWP 2018). If applicable, proposals should also analyse the social impacts.

Proposals should also allow for pre- and co-normative research necessary for developing the needed product quality standards and for ensuring safety of the end-products.

The technology readiness level (TRL)4 at the end of the project should be 7. Proposals should clearly state the starting TRL.

Indicative funding:

It is considered that proposals requesting a maximum contribution EUR 7 million would be able to address this specific challenge appropriately. However, this does not preclude the submission and selection of proposals requesting other amounts.

1From the 2016 BBI Call: EMBRACED (https://bbi-europe.eu/projects/embraced), URBIOFIN (https://bbi-europe.eu/projects/urbiofin), AFTERLIFE (https://bbi-europe.eu/projects/afterlife). From H2020-CIRC-2016 Call: RES URBIS (http://www.resurbis.eu/).

2Includes mixed waste streams and separately collected organic waste.

3The LCA may focus on a set of critical issues early on to steer the development process in the right direction. In this case, it is essential that this selection is carefully explained in the proposal in order to allow for expert assessment. See also in the introduction.

4Technology readiness levels as defined in annex G of the General Annexes to the Horizon 2020 Work Programme: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/wp/2018-2020/annexes/h2020-wp1820-annex-ga_en.pdf


Expected Impact:contribute to KPI 1: create at least one new cross-sector interconnection in bio-based economy;contribute to KPI 2: set the basis for at least one new bio-based value chain;contribute to KPI 6: create at least two new demonstrated consumer products based on bio-based chemicals and materials that meet market requirements;increase the awareness among consumers and waste management companies of the opportunities associated with the valorisation of urban waste streams into a wide range of products and materials;in the case of wastewater, recycle or reuse of at least 30 % in (dry) weight of the suspended solid fractions;reduce the amount of landfilled organic waste by at least 20 % as compared with the disposal solution(s) currently implemented for the same type of waste stream. Type of action: Innovation Action – demonstration action.


Cross-cutting Priorities:Cross-cutting Key-Enabling Technologies (KETs)


ver menos

Temáticas Obligatorias del proyecto: Temática principal: Urban waste Bioproducts (products that are manufactured using Process innovation Environmental biotechnology Production technology process engineering

Características del consorcio

Ámbito Europeo : La ayuda es de ámbito europeo, puede aplicar a esta linea cualquier empresa que forme parte de la Comunidad Europea.
Tipo y tamaño de organizaciones: El diseño de consorcio necesario para la tramitación de esta ayuda necesita de:

Características del Proyecto

Requisitos de diseño: Duración:
Requisitos técnicos: Specific Challenge:In 2016, an estimated 54 % of the world’s population lived in urban areas. That figure is projected to exceed 60 % in 20302. Cities, and the people living within them, produce an immense amount of solid waste and wastewater. Specific Challenge:In 2016, an estimated 54 % of the world’s population lived in urban areas. That figure is projected to exceed 60 % in 20302. Cities, and the people living within them, produce an immense amount of solid waste and wastewater.
¿Quieres ejemplos? Puedes consultar aquí los últimos proyectos conocidos financiados por esta línea, sus tecnologías, sus presupuestos y sus compañías.
Capítulos financiables: Los capítulos de gastos financiables para esta línea son:
Personnel costs.
Los costes de personal subvencionables cubren las horas de trabajo efectivo de las personas directamente dedicadas a la ejecución de la acción. Los propietarios de pequeñas y medianas empresas que no perciban salario y otras personas físicas que no perciban salario podrán imputar los costes de personal sobre la base de una escala de costes unitarios
Purchase costs.
Los otros costes directos se dividen en los siguientes apartados: Viajes, amortizaciones, equipamiento y otros bienes y servicios. Se financia la amortización de equipos, permitiendo incluir la amortización de equipos adquiridos antes del proyecto si se registra durante su ejecución. En el apartado de otros bienes y servicios se incluyen los diferentes bienes y servicios comprados por los beneficiarios a proveedores externos para poder llevar a cabo sus tareas
Subcontracting costs.
La subcontratación en ayudas europeas no debe tratarse del core de actividades de I+D del proyecto. El contratista debe ser seleccionado por el beneficiario de acuerdo con el principio de mejor relación calidad-precio bajo las condiciones de transparencia e igualdad (en ningún caso consistirá en solicitar menos de 3 ofertas). En el caso de entidades públicas, para la subcontratación se deberán de seguir las leyes que rijan en el país al que pertenezca el contratante
Madurez tecnológica: La tramitación de esta ayuda requiere de un nivel tecnológico mínimo en el proyecto de TRL 5:. Los elementos básicos de la innovación son integrados de manera que la configuración final es similar a su aplicación final, es decir que está listo para ser usado en la simulación de un entorno real. Se mejoran los modelos tanto técnicos como económicos del diseño inicial, se ha identificado adicionalmente aspectos de seguridad, limitaciones ambiéntales y/o regulatorios entre otros. + info.
TRL esperado:

Características de la financiación

Intensidad de la ayuda: Sólo fondo perdido + info
Fondo perdido:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
1.&nbsp;&nbsp; Eligible countries: described in Annex A of the H2020 Work Programme.
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects. See the information in the Online Manual.
&nbsp;
2. Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in Annex B and Annex C of the Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the proposal template in the submission tool below.
3.&nbsp;&nbsp; Evaluation:
Evaluation criteria, scoring and thresholds&nbsp;are described in&nbsp;Annex H&nbsp;of the H2020 Work Programme, with the exceptions described in part 2.3.6 of the&nbsp;BBI JU Work Plan.
Submission and evaluation processes&nbsp;are described in the&nbsp;Online Manual&nbsp;and the&nbsp;BBI JU Guide for applicants (RIA-IA-CSA)
&nbsp;
4.&nbsp;&nbsp; Indicative time for evaluation and grant agreement:
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Information on the outcome of evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
5.&nbsp;&nbsp; Proposal templates, evaluation forms and model...
1.&nbsp;&nbsp; Eligible countries: described in Annex A of the H2020 Work Programme.
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects. See the information in the Online Manual.
&nbsp;
2. Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in Annex B and Annex C of the Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the proposal template in the submission tool below.
3.&nbsp;&nbsp; Evaluation:
Evaluation criteria, scoring and thresholds&nbsp;are described in&nbsp;Annex H&nbsp;of the H2020 Work Programme, with the exceptions described in part 2.3.6 of the&nbsp;BBI JU Work Plan.
Submission and evaluation processes&nbsp;are described in the&nbsp;Online Manual&nbsp;and the&nbsp;BBI JU Guide for applicants (RIA-IA-CSA)
&nbsp;
4.&nbsp;&nbsp; Indicative time for evaluation and grant agreement:
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Information on the outcome of evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
5.&nbsp;&nbsp; Proposal templates, evaluation forms and model grant agreements (MGA):
Specific rules and funding rates: described in 2.3.6 of the&nbsp;BBI JU Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form (CSA-RIA-IA)
BBI JU MGA - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
&nbsp;
6. Additional requirements:
Technology readiness levels (TRL)
&nbsp;
Members of consortium are required to conclude a consortium agreement, in principle prior to the signature of the grant agreement.
7.&nbsp;&nbsp; Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions.
Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Open access to research data
The Open Research Data Pilot has been extended to cover all Horizon 2020 topics for which the submission is opened on 26 July 2016 or later. Projects funded under this topic will therefore by default provide open access to the research data they generate, except if they decide to opt-out under the conditions described in Annex L of the H2020 main Work Programme. Projects can opt-out at any stage, that is both before and after the grant signature.
Note that the evaluation phase proposals will not be evaluated more favourably because they plan to open or share their data, and will not be penalised for opting out.
Open research data sharing applies to the data needed to validate the results presented in scientific publications. Additionally, projects can choose to make other data available open access and need to describe their approach in a Data Management Plan.
Projects need to create a Data Management Plan (DMP), except if they opt-out of making their research data open access. A first version of the DMP must be provided as an early deliverable within six months of the project and should be updated during the project as appropriate. The Commission already provides guidance documents, including a template for DMPs. See the Online Manual.
Eligibility of costs: costs related to data management and data sharing are eligible for reimbursement during the project duration.
The legal requirements for projects participating in this pilot are in the article 29.3 of the Model Grant Agreement.
8.&nbsp;&nbsp; Additional documents
BBI JU Work Plan
BBI JU Scientific Innovation and Research Agenda (SIRA)
BBI JU Derogation to H2020 Rules for Participation
BBI JU Regulation of Establishment
H2020 Regulation of Establishment
H2020 Rules for Participation
H2020 Specific Programme
Frequently Asked Questions 2018
Garantías:
No exige Garantías
No existen condiciones financieras para el beneficiario.

Información adicional de la convocatoria

Efecto incentivador: Esta ayuda tiene efecto incentivador, por lo que el proyecto no puede haberse iniciado antes de la presentación de la solicitud de ayuda. + info.
Respuesta Organismo: Se calcula que aproximadamente, la respuesta del organismo una vez tramitada la ayuda es de:
Meses de respuesta:
Muy Competitiva:
No Competitiva Competitiva Muy Competitiva
No conocemos el presupuesto total de la línea
Minimis: Esta línea de financiación NO considera una “ayuda de minimis”. Puedes consultar la normativa aquí.

Otras ventajas

Sello PYME: Tramitar esta ayuda con éxito permite conseguir el sello de calidad de “sello pyme innovadora”. Que permite ciertas ventajas fiscales.
H2020-BBI-JTI-2018 Find solutions to dilution, pollution and content diversity challenges to turn mixed urban bio-waste (1) into sustainable feedstock for the bio-based industry Specific Challenge:In 2016, an estimated 54 % of the world’s population lived in urban areas. That figure is projected to exceed 60 % in 203...
Sin info.
BBI.2018.SO1.D1 Improve the logistical and pre-processing steps of locally sourced biomass to serve as feedstock for the bio-based industry
en consorcio: Specific Challenge:Getting biomass feedstock from its sources in rural1 and coastal areas to processing plants in the bio-based industry tod...
Cerrada hace 6 años | Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
BBI.2018.SO1.R1 Resolve logistical, infrastructural and technological challenges to valorise residual and side streams from aquaculture, fisheries and the aquatic biomass processing industries
en consorcio: Specific Challenge:Residual streams from aquaculture, fisheries and the aquatic processing industries contain a varied mixture of bone, cart...
Cerrada hace 6 años | Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
BBI.2018.SO1.D2 Find solutions to dilution, pollution and content diversity challenges to turn mixed urban bio-waste (1) into sustainable feedstock for the bio-based industry
en consorcio: Specific Challenge:In 2016, an estimated 54 % of the world’s population lived in urban areas. That figure is projected to exceed 60 % in 203...
Cerrada hace 6 años | Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de