The Intersectional Politics of Antagonism in Peacebuilding
The Colombian peace process signed in 2016 has shown that even when peace agreements include comprehensive measures to tackle structural inequalities seen as the root causes of the conflict, they may still be rejected by the very...
ver más
¿Tienes un proyecto y buscas un partner? Gracias a nuestro motor inteligente podemos recomendarte los mejores socios y ponerte en contacto con ellos. Te lo explicamos en este video
Proyectos interesantes
RTI2018-098281-B-I00
POLITICAS DE CONSTRUCCION DE PAZ DE LA UE EN COLOMBIA. ¿HACI...
84K€
Cerrado
HAR2015-74378-JIN
CONTRIBUCIONES DE LA RESISTENCIA CIVIL PARA LA PREVENCION DE...
137K€
Cerrado
KW Rebel Integration
The International Rebel Integration Toolkit Revisited What...
213K€
Cerrado
URPEACE
The peace building agency of stigmatized civilian actors in...
203K€
Cerrado
JAD-PBP
Just and durable peace by piece
2M€
Cerrado
MEMORYREIMAGINED
Memory Reimagined Gender and Intersectionality in Participa...
219K€
Cerrado
Información proyecto IPAP
Duración del proyecto: 32 meses
Fecha Inicio: 2020-04-10
Fecha Fin: 2022-12-31
Líder del proyecto
ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY
No se ha especificado una descripción o un objeto social para esta compañía.
TRL
4-5
Presupuesto del proyecto
225K€
Fecha límite de participación
Sin fecha límite de participación.
Descripción del proyecto
The Colombian peace process signed in 2016 has shown that even when peace agreements include comprehensive measures to tackle structural inequalities seen as the root causes of the conflict, they may still be rejected by the very societal groups meant to benefit from such transformative provisions. IPAP addresses this dilemma by exploring how peacebuilding institutions can implement a peace agreement that is contested and work to include groups who have engaged in antagonistic actions against the peace accord. The research counters a tendency in the literature to treat resistance against peacebuilding as deviance or abnormality or as a mere manifestation of political and economic elites’ fear of losing power, by including the intersectional politics which explains these groups’ undermining or rejection of the peace process. The objectives of IPAP are: 1) to identify the fabric of antagonistic forces to peace and map their relations with political actors; 2) to examine the intersectional systems of power differentials through which antagonistic subject positions emerge and analyse how they transform into agonistic, i.e. constructively conflictive, relations with the work of peacebuilding institutions; 3) to explore possibilities for peacebuilding institutions to gain sustained legitimacy among the local population; 4) to identify ways in which peace institutions might engage with difference and create spaces where adversaries can engage in agonistic dialogue. To achieve these objectives, IPAP uses a feminist intersectional lens to peacebuilding, and an ethnographic fieldwork approach, to empirically study Colombia as a rich case of antagonism to peacebuilding. The innovative approach of IPAP consists in advancing the notion of antagonistic subject positions to peace to identify the intersecting relations of power through which groups of population who resist peacebuilding processes are organized and how they can commit to agonistic dialogue.