Hola,
¿eres nuevo aquí?

Regístrate gratis y conecta tu empresa con financiación pública, partners y proyectos.

Tengo cuenta

Regístrate

Ver video

INSPiRE

Financiado

Cerrado

The Influence of Information Search on Preference Formation and Choice

Cost-benefit analyses are routinely used by policy makers when designing environmental policy to weigh the costs and benefits of different policy alternatives, and stated choice experiments are used to value the non-marketed costs... ver más

31/10/2020

U STIRLING

183K€

Presupuesto del proyecto: 183K€

Líder del proyecto

THE UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING No se ha especificado una descripción o un objeto social para esta compañía.

TRL 4-5

Fecha límite participación Sin fecha límite de participación.

Financiación concedida El organismo H2020 notifico la concesión del proyecto el día 2020-10-31

MSCA-IF-2017: Individual Fellowships

I+D

Cerrada hace 7 años

0% 100%

Información adicional privada

No hay información privada compartida para este proyecto. Habla con el coordinador.

1 Participantes

U STIRLING

183.45K€ | Lider

Proyectos interesantes

ECO2015-65031-R

Data Science

Social Sciences

15K€ Cerrado

ECO2012-34202

Data Science

Social Sciences

54K€ Cerrado

ECO2009-12836

Data Science

Social Sciences

107K€ Cerrado

PID2019-107081GB-I00

Data Science

Social Sciences

50K€ Cerrado

EPP

Data Science

Applied Physics

1M€ Cerrado

PID2019-106642GB-I00

Data Science

Social Sciences

21K€ Cerrado

Conecta tu I+D

¿Tienes un proyecto y buscas un partner? Gracias a nuestro motor inteligente podemos recomendarte los mejores socios y ponerte en contacto con ellos. Te lo explicamos en este video

Duración del proyecto: 30 meses Fecha Inicio: 2018-04-03
Fecha Fin: 2020-10-31

Líder del proyecto

THE UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING No se ha especificado una descripción o un objeto social para esta compañía.

TRL 4-5

Presupuesto del proyecto 183K€

Fecha límite de participación Sin fecha límite de participación.

Descripción del proyecto Cost-benefit analyses are routinely used by policy makers when designing environmental policy to weigh the costs and benefits of different policy alternatives, and stated choice experiments are used to value the non-marketed costs and benefits included in such analyses. Standard practice in stated choice experiments is to create a hypothetical market environment in which people choose among competing policy alternatives under the assumptions that they have complete information about all available policy alternatives, and that they are perfectly rational and maximize utility based on a clearly defined set of preferences, which can be retrieved when needed in any choice situation. In reality, these assumptions are questionable. Drawing on accumulating evidence from economics, psychology and marketing, this project aims to understand how searching for information about policy alternatives affects stated preference formation, learning and choice, and the extent to which this can address hypothetical bias. The project develops a novel experimental procedure that addresses important issues in stated choice experiments and make significant and original methodological contributions that advance current practice beyond state-of-the-art in both experimental design and data analysis. Improving the reliability of stated choice experiments will lead to improved estimates of non-marketed costs and benefits included in cost-benefit analyses. Through a broad uptake and use of these methods by stated preference practitioners, and increased awareness among policy makers, the methodological developments in this project can lead to improved policy recommendations and implementation across the EU.

Conecta tu I+D

Entra hoy

¿Olvidé mi contraseña?

Financiación

Empresas

CTIs/Universidades

Proyectos

Investigadores