DEEPEN EXPLORES THE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE OF CAPITAL-FUNDED OCCUPATIONAL PENSION SCHEMES. WE ADOPT SCHARPFS DISTINCTION BETWEEN INPUT LEGITIMACY (ARE COLLECTIVELY BINDING DECISIONS IN LINE WITH CITIZENS DEMOCRATICALLY EXPRESSED...
ver más
Fecha límite participación
Sin fecha límite de participación.
Financiación
concedida
El organismo AGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN notifico la concesión del proyecto
el día 2020-01-01
No tenemos la información de la convocatoria
0%
100%
Información adicional privada
No hay información privada compartida para este proyecto. Habla con el coordinador.
¿Tienes un proyecto y buscas un partner? Gracias a nuestro motor inteligente podemos recomendarte los mejores socios y ponerte en contacto con ellos. Te lo explicamos en este video
Proyectos interesantes
G20LAP
G20 Legitimacy and Policymaking
319K€
Cerrado
D-EMU
Democratic elite perceptions of Economic and Monetary Union
190K€
Cerrado
WillingToPay
Willing to Pay? Testing Institutionalist Theory with Experim...
2M€
Cerrado
PenAgeing
Fair Pensions and Population Ageing
150K€
Cerrado
PERITIA
Policy Expertise and Trust in Action
3M€
Cerrado
POLEVPOP
How politicians evaluate public opinion
2M€
Cerrado
Fecha límite de participación
Sin fecha límite de participación.
Descripción del proyecto
DEEPEN EXPLORES THE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE OF CAPITAL-FUNDED OCCUPATIONAL PENSION SCHEMES. WE ADOPT SCHARPFS DISTINCTION BETWEEN INPUT LEGITIMACY (ARE COLLECTIVELY BINDING DECISIONS IN LINE WITH CITIZENS DEMOCRATICALLY EXPRESSED PREFERENCES?) AND OUTPUT LEGITIMACY (DO COLLECTIVELY BINDING DECISIONS SERVE THE COMMON INTERESTS OF THE CITIZENS?) TO INVESTIGATE HOW GOVERNMENTS, REGULATORS AND LABOUR MARKET ACTORS GOVERN FUNDED PENSIONS (INPUT LEGITIMACY) AND WHETHER PARTICIPANTS ARE SATISFIED WITH PENSION FUND PERFORMANCE (OUTPUT LEGITIMACY). THE PROJECT FOCUSES ON DENMARK, THE NETHERLANDS, GERMANY, AUSTRIA, IRELAND AND SPAIN BECAUSE THE STRUCTURE OF FUNDED PENSION PROVISION VARIES ALONG KEY DIMENSIONS RELEVANT TO INPUT AND OUTPUT LEGITIMACY. THE PROJECT COMBINES QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SURVEY DATA WITH COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIES BASED ON ELITE AND EXPERT INTERVIEWS AND ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY DOCUMENTS.FOUR WORK PACKAGES INVESTIGATE THE FOLLOWING RESEARCH QUESTIONS: HOW DOES NATIONAL POLICY DEFINE PARTICIPANT INFLUENCE ON FUNDED PENSION PROVISION? HOW DO STAKEHOLDERS USE PENSION FUND GOVERNANCE TO INFLUENCE INVESTMENT POLICY? HOW HAVE CAPITAL-FUNDED PENSION SCHEMES PERFORMED IN TERMS OF PENSION OUTCOMES ACROSS EUROPEAN WELFARE STATES? TO WHAT EXTENT ARE INDIVIDUAL ATTITUDES ON PENSION INVESTMENT ALIGNED WITH THESE INPUTS AND OUTPUTS?THE PROJECT TEAM INCLUDES RESEARCHERS FROM THE FIELDS OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, SOCIAL POLICY, AND SOCIOLOGY, WHOSE COMBINED EXPERTISE INCLUDES PENSION POLITICS AND POLICY, FINANCIALIZATION, AND THE POLITICS AND SOCIOLOGY OF THE WELFARE STATE. THE PROJECT WILL CONTRIBUTE TO ACADEMIC AND POLICY DEBATES THROUGH JOURNAL ARTICLES, A SPECIAL ISSUE, CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS, AND OUTREACH ACTIVITIES AIMED AT NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN POLICYMAKERS AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS. UNDED PENSIONS\FINANCIALISATION\ATTITUDES\GOVERNANCE