Hola,
¿eres nuevo aquí?

Regístrate gratis y conecta tu empresa con financiación pública, partners y proyectos.

Tengo cuenta

Regístrate

Ver video

POLEVPOP

Financiado

Cerrado

How politicians evaluate public opinion

In democracies, policies are expected to be responsive to public opinion. Extant research showed that responsiveness is selective. It varies across issues, time and countries. Yet, how come policies vary in their responsiveness ha... ver más

31/12/2026

UANTWERPEN

2M€

Presupuesto del proyecto: 2M€

Líder del proyecto

UNIVERSITEIT ANTWERPEN No se ha especificado una descripción o un objeto social para esta compañía.

TRL 4-5

Fecha límite participación Sin fecha límite de participación.

Ver 2 Participantes

Financiación concedida El organismo H2020 notifico la concesión del proyecto el día 2021-08-30

ERC-2020-ADG: ERC ADVANCED GRANT

I+D

Cerrada hace 4 años

0% 100% 100%

Información adicional privada

No hay información privada compartida para este proyecto. Habla con el coordinador.

2 Participantes

UANTWERPEN

2.50M€ | Lider

FAES FARMA

2.53M€ | Participante

Proyectos interesantes

CSO2008-01436

Data Science

Social Sciences

73K€ Cerrado

POLITICALMIND

Data Science

Social Sciences

1M€ Cerrado

INTRAPOL

Data Science

Social Sciences

2M€ Cerrado

POLEMIC

Data Science

Social Sciences

1M€ Cerrado

DEMSTAT

Data Science

Social Sciences

202K€ Cerrado

CSO2013-40870-R

Data Science

Social Sciences

42K€ Cerrado

Conecta tu I+D

¿Tienes un proyecto y buscas un partner? Gracias a nuestro motor inteligente podemos recomendarte los mejores socios y ponerte en contacto con ellos. Te lo explicamos en este video

Duración del proyecto: 64 meses Fecha Inicio: 2021-08-30
Fecha Fin: 2026-12-31

Líder del proyecto

UNIVERSITEIT ANTWERPEN No se ha especificado una descripción o un objeto social para esta compañía.

TRL 4-5

Presupuesto del proyecto 2M€

Fecha límite de participación Sin fecha límite de participación.

Descripción del proyecto In democracies, policies are expected to be responsive to public opinion. Extant research showed that responsiveness is selective. It varies across issues, time and countries. Yet, how come policies vary in their responsiveness has not received a satisfying answer. POLEVPOP formulates and examines a novel answer to the puzzle why policy responsiveness varies. Its core argument holds that politicians evaluate public opinion and let their actions—in line with public opinion or going against it—depend on their appraisal. When public opinion is evaluated negatively, it has no effect on what politicians do; that it is evaluated positively increases the chance that politicians act congruently. Politicians’ appraisal of public opinion has been completely overlooked as a mechanism bringing about responsive representation. Considering it a core factor POLEVPOP examines three matters: (1) which criteria politicians use to appraise public opinion; (2) how, depending on the opinion content of the message, the channel through which the opinion is conveyed and the group from which it comes, concrete public opinion signals are evaluated; and, (3) which effect these evaluations have on politicians’ political action. The central expectation is that public opinion is evaluated by politicians based on a consistent and common scoreboard. For instance, opinion signals are rated based on their representativity and underlying public opinion is evaluated on its quality and its intensity. The project tackles these matters drawing on a comparative study in eight different countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Israel, Portugal, Switzerland, and Sweden). In two consecutive rounds of data gathering, a large sample of politicians is surveyed and interviewed, and they are subjected to a series of survey-embedded experiments. To put politicians’ behavior in perspective, their answers are compared to parallel citizen surveys in all countries.

Conecta tu I+D

Entra hoy

¿Olvidé mi contraseña?

Financiación

Empresas

CTIs/Universidades

Proyectos

Investigadores