HORIZON EUROPE
Cerrada
SFS-24-2016
SFS-24-2016:
Reinforcing international cooperation on sustainable aquaculture production with countries from South-East Asia
Europeo
Specific Challenge:With 90% of all world aquaculture production based in Asia, and with Europe importing close to 70% of its seafood (in particular from South-East Asia[1]), both regions have an interest in working together to develop sustainable solutions, since production has to nearly double in the next decade to meet the increasing seafood market demand. Sustainable aquaculture production is a major challenge for global seafood security and safety. In order to provide greater benefits for the EU and South-East Asian countries and to make future aquaculture sustainable, more work is needed on technology innovation, resource efficiency, reduced environmental impact, harmonised standards and marketing.
Sólo fondo perdido
0 €
Europeo
Esta convocatoria está cerrada
Esta línea ya está cerrada por lo que no puedes aplicar. Cerró el pasado día 17-02-2016.
Se espera una próxima convocatoria para esta ayuda, aún no está clara la fecha exacta de inicio de convocatoria.
Por suerte, hemos conseguido la lista de proyectos financiados!
Presentación:
Consorcio
Consorcio:
Esta ayuda está diseñada para aplicar a ella en formato consorcio.
Número mínimo de participantes.
Esta ayuda financia
Proyectos:
Objetivo del proyecto:
Specific Challenge:With 90% of all world aquaculture production based in Asia, and with Europe importing close to 70% of its seafood (in particular from South-East Asia[1]), both regions have an interest in working together to develop sustainable solutions, since production has to nearly double in the next decade to meet the increasing seafood market demand. Sustainable aquaculture production is a major challenge for global seafood security and safety. In order to provide greater benefits for the EU and South-East Asian countries and to make future aquaculture sustainable, more work is needed on technology innovation, resource efficiency, reduced environmental impact, harmonised standards and marketing.
Scope:Proposals should draw up a plan to launch a multi-stakeholder platform to reinforce international cooperation between Europe and South-East Asian countries on food security and safety with specific emphasis on sustainable aquaculture production and contributing to European competitiveness. The multi-stakeholder platform should support structuring new networks and partnerships between industrial players aiming to enhance business opportunities and the up-tak...
ver más
Specific Challenge:With 90% of all world aquaculture production based in Asia, and with Europe importing close to 70% of its seafood (in particular from South-East Asia[1]), both regions have an interest in working together to develop sustainable solutions, since production has to nearly double in the next decade to meet the increasing seafood market demand. Sustainable aquaculture production is a major challenge for global seafood security and safety. In order to provide greater benefits for the EU and South-East Asian countries and to make future aquaculture sustainable, more work is needed on technology innovation, resource efficiency, reduced environmental impact, harmonised standards and marketing.
Scope:Proposals should draw up a plan to launch a multi-stakeholder platform to reinforce international cooperation between Europe and South-East Asian countries on food security and safety with specific emphasis on sustainable aquaculture production and contributing to European competitiveness. The multi-stakeholder platform should support structuring new networks and partnerships between industrial players aiming to enhance business opportunities and the up-take of innovations in promising aquaculture domains. Those participating in the platform should also contribute to the development of common standards for appropriate environmental planning/zoning, increased food safety, and improved farming governance. Additionally, there should be particular focus on reinforcing capacity building by aligning European training programmes, including through industrial apprenticeship opportunities and networking with South-East Asian partners.
The Commission considers that proposals requesting a contribution from the EU of up to EUR 2 million would allow this challenge to be addressed appropriately. Nonetheless, this does not preclude the submission and selection of proposals requesting other amounts.
Projects funded under this topic will by default participate in the Pilot on Open Research Data in Horizon 2020, with the option to opt-out, as described in the introduction.
Expected Impact:To contribute to the creation of a long-term partnership between Europe and South-East Asian countries on sustainable aquaculture and to reinforce the mutual benefits of science diplomacy between the regions, proposals will have to:
Contribute to common standard setting and legislation, particularly around ecosystem-based farming. Facilitate the creation of business opportunities for industrial partnerships between Europe and South-East Asian countries. Reduce risks to animal and human health and thus increase EU consumer’s confidence in seafood products. Consolidate EU-South-East Asian education and training networks. Contribute to reinforce targeted international cooperation on sustainable aquaculture production between EU and South East-Asian countries, supporting the EU-ASEAN Partnership[2] and the underlying EU-ASEAN High-level Policy Dialogue on science, technology and innovation. Improve the professional skills and competences for those working and being trained to work within the blue economy.
Delegation Exception Footnote:This activity directly aimed at supporting the promotion of coherent and effective cooperation with third countries is excluded from the delegation to REA and will be implemented by the Commission services.
Cross-cutting Priorities:International cooperation
[1]South-East Asian countries: Indonesia, East Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, East Timor, Brunei, Christmas Island, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar (Burma), Thailand, West Malaysia, and Vietnam.
[2]In 2007, the Nuremberg Declaration on an Enhanced EU-ASEAN Partnership was signed at the 16th Ministerial Meeting, in Nuremberg. In 2012, Foreign Ministers of ASEAN and the EU adopted the Bandar Seri Begawan Plan of Action 2013-2017, defining ASEAN-EU cooperation in the next five years.
ver menos
Temáticas Obligatorias del proyecto:
Temática principal:
Business development
Seafood economy
Natural resources exploration and exploitation
Business environment (legal and administrative)
Environment
fisheries and aquaculture interaction
Seafood quality and safety
Aquaculture
fisheries
Características del consorcio
Ámbito Europeo :
La ayuda es de ámbito europeo, puede aplicar a esta linea cualquier empresa que forme parte de la Comunidad Europea.
:
La ayuda es de ámbito europeo, puede aplicar a esta linea cualquier empresa que forme parte de la Comunidad Europea.
Tipo y tamaño de organizaciones:
El diseño de consorcio necesario para la tramitación de esta ayuda necesita de:
Características del Proyecto
Requisitos de diseño:
Duración:
Requisitos técnicos: Specific Challenge:With 90% of all world aquaculture production based in Asia, and with Europe importing close to 70% of its seafood (in particular from South-East Asia[1]), both regions have an interest in working together to develop sustainable solutions, since production has to nearly double in the next decade to meet the increasing seafood market demand. Sustainable aquaculture production is a major challenge for global seafood security and safety. In order to provide greater benefits for the EU and South-East Asian countries and to make future aquaculture sustainable, more work is needed on technology innovation, resource efficiency, reduced environmental impact, harmonised standards and marketing.
Specific Challenge:With 90% of all world aquaculture production based in Asia, and with Europe importing close to 70% of its seafood (in particular from South-East Asia[1]), both regions have an interest in working together to develop sustainable solutions, since production has to nearly double in the next decade to meet the increasing seafood market demand. Sustainable aquaculture production is a major challenge for global seafood security and safety. In order to provide greater benefits for the EU and South-East Asian countries and to make future aquaculture sustainable, more work is needed on technology innovation, resource efficiency, reduced environmental impact, harmonised standards and marketing.
¿Quieres ejemplos? Puedes consultar aquí los últimos proyectos conocidos financiados por esta línea, sus tecnologías, sus presupuestos y sus compañías.
Capítulos financiables:
Los capítulos de gastos financiables para esta línea son:
Personnel costs.
Los costes de personal subvencionables cubren las horas de trabajo efectivo de las personas directamente dedicadas a la ejecución de la acción. Los propietarios de pequeñas y medianas empresas que no perciban salario y otras personas físicas que no perciban salario podrán imputar los costes de personal sobre la base de una escala de costes unitarios
Los costes de personal subvencionables cubren las horas de trabajo efectivo de las personas directamente dedicadas a la ejecución de la acción. Los propietarios de pequeñas y medianas empresas que no perciban salario y otras personas físicas que no perciban salario podrán imputar los costes de personal sobre la base de una escala de costes unitarios
Purchase costs.
Los otros costes directos se dividen en los siguientes apartados: Viajes, amortizaciones, equipamiento y otros bienes y servicios. Se financia la amortización de equipos, permitiendo incluir la amortización de equipos adquiridos antes del proyecto si se registra durante su ejecución. En el apartado de otros bienes y servicios se incluyen los diferentes bienes y servicios comprados por los beneficiarios a proveedores externos para poder llevar a cabo sus tareas
Los otros costes directos se dividen en los siguientes apartados: Viajes, amortizaciones, equipamiento y otros bienes y servicios. Se financia la amortización de equipos, permitiendo incluir la amortización de equipos adquiridos antes del proyecto si se registra durante su ejecución. En el apartado de otros bienes y servicios se incluyen los diferentes bienes y servicios comprados por los beneficiarios a proveedores externos para poder llevar a cabo sus tareas
Subcontracting costs.
La subcontratación en ayudas europeas no debe tratarse del core de actividades de I+D del proyecto. El contratista debe ser seleccionado por el beneficiario de acuerdo con el principio de mejor relación calidad-precio bajo las condiciones de transparencia e igualdad (en ningún caso consistirá en solicitar menos de 3 ofertas). En el caso de entidades públicas, para la subcontratación se deberán de seguir las leyes que rijan en el país al que pertenezca el contratante
La subcontratación en ayudas europeas no debe tratarse del core de actividades de I+D del proyecto. El contratista debe ser seleccionado por el beneficiario de acuerdo con el principio de mejor relación calidad-precio bajo las condiciones de transparencia e igualdad (en ningún caso consistirá en solicitar menos de 3 ofertas). En el caso de entidades públicas, para la subcontratación se deberán de seguir las leyes que rijan en el país al que pertenezca el contratante
Madurez tecnológica:
La tramitación de esta ayuda requiere de un nivel tecnológico mínimo en el proyecto de TRL 5:.
Los elementos básicos de la innovación son integrados de manera que la configuración final es similar a su aplicación final, es decir que está listo para ser usado en la simulación de un entorno real. Se mejoran los modelos tanto técnicos como económicos del diseño inicial, se ha identificado adicionalmente aspectos de seguridad, limitaciones ambiéntales y/o regulatorios entre otros. + info.
Características de la financiación
Intensidad de la ayuda:
Sólo fondo perdido
+ info
Fondo perdido:
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects. See the information in the Online Manual.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
The conditions specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) are described in the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
The award criteria and evaluation procedure specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) is described in the MSCA section of the General Work Programme.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Informatio... Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects. See the information in the Online Manual.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
The conditions specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) are described in the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
The award criteria and evaluation procedure specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) is described in the MSCA section of the General Work Programme.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
[SME instrument, ToA SME-1]:
Information on the outcome of phase 1 of the SME Instrument: maximum 2 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 3 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[SME instrument, ToA SME-2]:
Information on the outcome of phase 2 of the SME Instrument: maximum 4 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 6 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[FET multiple cut-off]:
Information on the outcome of evaluation: maximum 5 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[FTI multiple cut-off]:
Information on the outcome: maximum 3 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 6 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
Research and Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Coordination and Support Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
SME instrument (phase 1):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA SME Ph1 - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA SME Ph1 – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
SME instrument (phase 2):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA SME Ph2 - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA SME Ph2 – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
ERA-NET Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA ERA-NET Cofund - Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Thematic clusters of previous ERA-NET projects
Practical guidance how to organise ERA-NET joint calls
Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Grant Agreement
Specific requirements for innovation procurement supported by Horizon 2020 grants (PCP, PPI)
Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions (PPI):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Grant Agreement
Specific requirements for innovation procurement supported by Horizon 2020 grants (PCP, PP)
European Joint Programme (EJP):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA EJP Cofund – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Framework Partnership Agreement:
Specific provisions and funding rates (FPA & SGA)
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA Framework Partnership - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Framework Partnership - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Specific – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Specific – Mono-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
[MSC types of action]:
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA IF)
European Fellowships:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC IF – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA IF)
Global Fellowships:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC IF – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Training Networks:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Industrial Doctorates:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Anotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Joint Doctorates:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN – Multi--Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE):
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC RISE – Multi--Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Co-funding of regional, national and international programmes (COFUND)
Doctoral programmes:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC COFUND - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Co-funding of regional, national and international programmes (COFUND)
Fellowship programmes:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC COFUND - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – where a topic description foresees financial support to Third Parties, these provisions apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
[Topics participating in the open access to research data pilot]
This topic participates per default in the open access to research data pilot which aims to improve and maximise access to and re-use of research data generated by projects:
- The pilot applies to the data needed to validate the results presented in scientific publications. Additionally, projects can choose to make other data available for open access and need to describe their approach in a Data Management Plan (to be provided within six months after the project start).
- Note that the evaluation phase proposals will not be evaluated more favourably because they are part of the Pilot, and will not be penalised for opting out of the Pilot.
- Projects can at any stage opt-out of the pilot.
The legal requirements for projects participating in this pilot are in the article 29.3 of the Model Grant Agreement.
Further information on the Open Research Data Pilot is made available in the H2020 Online Manual.
Additional documents:
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Introduction
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Future and Emerging Technologies (FETs)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Marie Sklodowska-Curie actions (MSCA)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Research infrastructures (including e-Infrastructures)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Introduction to Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies (LEITs)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Information and communication technologies (ICT)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Nanotechnologies, advanced materials, advanced manufacturing and processing, biotechnology
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Space
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Access to risk finance
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Innovation in SMEs
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Health, demographic change and wellbeing
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Food security, sustainable agriculture and forestry, marine and maritime and inland water research and the bioeconomy
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Secure, clean and efficient energy
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Smart, green and integrated transport
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Climate action, environment, resource efficiency and raw materials
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Europe in a changing world - inclusive, innovative and reflective societies
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Secure societies – protecting freedom and security of Europe and its citizens
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Spreading excellence and widening participation
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Science with and for society
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Cross-cutting activities (Focus Areas)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Fast Track to Innovation Pilot
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Dissemination, Exploitation and Evaluation
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: General Annexes
Euratom Work Programme 2016-17
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Euratom Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[ERC – 2017 topic conditions template]
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: the conditions specific to the ERC are described in the ERC 2017 Work Programme under the heading 'Eligibility criteria' and in 'Annex 3'. An overview is provided below:
The ERC actions are open to researchers of any nationality who intend to conduct their research activity in any EU Member State or H2020 Associated Country. Principal Investigators may be of any age and nationality and may reside in any country in the world at the time of the application. ERC Principal Investigators do not have to be based full-time in Europe.
The host institution must either be established in an EU Member State or H2020 Associated Country as a legal entity created under national law, or it may be an International European Interest Organisation (such as CERN, EMBL, etc.), the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) or any other entity created under EU law.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions:
The conditions specific to ERC grants are described in the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the heading 'Eligibility criteria' and in the ERC Rules for Submission and Evaluation under Section 2.4. An overview is provided below:
Eligible proposals:
Eligible Principal Investigator:
Eligible Host Institution:
Restrictions on submission of proposals:
Proposal page limits and layout: A complete proposal is composed of:
• Administrative Proposal Submission forms (including Ethics Review Table) are available in the submission tool below – registration to Participant Portal is required first.
• The Research Proposal (Parts B1 and B2), also available in the submission tool, should be uploaded and submitted via the submission tool as PDF files.
Proposal Part B1
Extended Synopsis: max. 5 pages (please note that references do not count towards the page limits)
Curriculum Vitae: max. 2 pages
Funding ID: no page limits
Track Record: max. 2 pages
Proposal Part B2
Scientific Proposal: max. 15 pages (please note that references do not count towards the page limit)
• Host Institution Binding Statement of Support (available on this page below and as a word-template in PPSS).
• Ethics review self-assessment (if applicable) and supporting documentation.
Evaluation
The conditions specific to ERC are described in the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the heading 'Evaluation procedure and criteria' and in the ERC Rules for Submission and Evaluation. An overview is provided below:
Evaluation procedure
A single submission of the full proposal will be followed by a two-step evaluation. The evaluation will be conducted by means of a structure of high level peer review panels as listed in Annex 1 of the ERC Work Programme 2017. The panels may be assisted by independent experts working remotely.
Evaluation criteria
For all ERC frontier research grants excellence is the sole criterion of evaluation. It will be applied in conjunction to the evaluation of both: the ground-breaking nature, ambition and feasibility of the research project; and the intellectual capacity, creativity and commitment of the Principal Investigator. The detailed evaluation elements applying to the excellence of the research project and the Principal Investigator are set out in the ERC Work Programme 2017.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the heading 'Indicative summary of main calls from the 2017 budget'.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
ERC Starting Grant
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Starting Grant profile'.
Information for the applicants of the Starting and Consolidator Grants
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
ERC Guide for Peer Reviewers – STG, COG, ADG
H2020 ERC MGA – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
ERC Consolidator Grant
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Consolidator Grant profile'.
Information for the applicants of the Starting and Consolidator Grants
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
ERC Guide for Peer Reviewers – STG, COG, ADG
H2020 ERC MGA – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
ERC Advanced Grant
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Advanced Grant profile'.
Information for the applicants of the Advanced Grants
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
ERC Guide for Peer Reviewers – STG, COG, ADG
H2020 ERC MGA – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
ERC Proof of Concept Grant
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Proof of Concept Grant profile'.
Information for the applicants of the Proof of Concept Grants
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
ERC Guide for Peer Reviewers – POC
H2020 ERC MGA PoC - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA PoC - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Open access
The ERC supports the principle of open access to the published output of research, including in particular peer-reviewed articles and monographs, as a fundamental part of its mission. It also supports the basic principle of open access to research data and data related products such as computer code. The ERC considers that providing free online access to all these materials can be the most effective way of ensuring that the fruits of the research it funds can be accessed, read and used as the basis for further research.
Under Horizon 2020, beneficiaries of ERC grants must ensure open access to all peer-reviewed scientific publications relating to their results as set out in Article 29.2 of the ERC Model Grant Agreement.
In addition, for the first time under Horizon 2020, beneficiaries of ERC frontier research grants funded under this Work Programme will automatically be covered by the provisions on research data sharing as set out in Article 29.3 of the ERC Model Grant Agreement unless they specifically decide to opt-out. Beneficiaries that do not opt-out should also ensure appropriate management (including preservation and curation) of the research data they generate in order to ensure its sustainability. These provisions are designed to facilitate access, re-use and preservation of research data generated during the ERC funded research work. For more guidance, please see the Online Manual.
Beneficiaries should carefully check the additional obligations related to open research data contained in Article 29.3. They may opt-out of the provisions of the previous paragraph at any stage, thereby freeing themselves retroactively from the associated obligations.
Additional documents:
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[Prizes – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part 8 of the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink of the Rules for Contests. Please send all the contest documents to RTD J.3 for publication and they will send you the hyperlinks to be added.
Eligibility and exclusion criteria: described in part 8 of the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to the application template.
Evaluation and award criteria and procedure: described in part 3 of the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and award of prizes:
Please add the timelines.
Application templates and evaluation forms for prizes under this topic:
Application template for inducement prizes is available after entering the submission tool below.
Evaluation form for inducement prizes
Additional provisions: described in the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink.
The general rules for Prizes are described in part F of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme
Additional documents:
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Euratom Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) – 2016 topic conditions template]
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: Described in section 7.2 of the EIT 2016 Call text for KICs proposals.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: Described in section 7 of the EIT 2016 Call text for KICs proposals.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: Described in section 7 of the EIT 2016 Call text for KICs proposals.
The three criteria are STRATEGY, OPERATIONS and IMPACT.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the EIT Proposal template 2016.
The proposal is limited to 50 pages.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and KIC designation: Described in section 7 of the EIT 2016 Call text for KICs proposals.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
EIT Proposal Evaluation form 2016
During the start-up phase, which may follow the KIC designation, the contractual relations are usually framed by:
EIT Model Start-up Grant Agreement - a multi-beneficiary agreement signed by the EIT and the designated KIC coordinator.
Once a new KIC legal entity is established, the contractual relations are framed by:
EIT Model Framework Partnership Agreement - a multi-beneficiary agreement signed by the EIT and the new KIC Legal Entity.
EIT Model Specific Grant Agreement - a multi-beneficiary agreement signed by the EIT and the new KIC Legal Entity.
Additional documents:
Framework of Guidance - provides additional information about characteristics of a successful KIC.
EIT principles for financing, monitoring and evaluating KIC activities
KICs background information
EIT Strategic and Innovation Agenda (EIT SIA) which also includes Advanced Manufacturing and Food4Future Factsheets
EIT regulation and its Amendment
EIT financial regulation and its Amendment
[BBI JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme, with the exceptions described in part 3.5.7 of the BBI JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process and the BBI JU Calls - Guide for applicants (RIA-IA-CSA).
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
BBI Research and Innovation Action (BBI-RIA)
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the Annex of the BBI JU Annual Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
BBI JU Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
BBI Innovation Action Demonstration (BBI-IA-DEMO)
and BBI Innovation Action Flagship (BBI-IA-FLAG)
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the Annex of the BBI JU Annual Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form (FLAG)
Standard evaluation form (DEMO)
BBI JU Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
BBI Coordination and Support Action (BBI-CSA)
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the Annex of the BBI JU Annual Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
BBI JU Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Technology readiness levels (TRL) apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents
BBI JU Call fiche
BBI JU Work Plan
BBI JU Scientific Innovation and Research Agenda (SIRA)
Horizon 2020 Rules for participation
BBI JU Derogation to H2020 Rules for Participation
BBI JU Regulation of establishment
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[Clean Sky calls – 2016 topics conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in Part A of the General Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B & C of the general Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part F of the General Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process:
described in the Clean Sky 2 Rules for submission, evaluation, selection, award and review procedures of calls for Core Partners.
described in the Clean Sky 2 Rules for submission, evaluation, selection, award and review procedures of calls for proposals.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement: maximum 8 months from the date of closure of the call.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
The proposal templates will be available in the submission system. The templates below serve only as examples.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
H2020 Clean Sky 2 JU MGA for Members
H2020 Clean Sky 2 JU MGA for Partners - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Clean Sky 2 JU MGA for Partners - Mono-Beneficiary
Additional provisions:
Clean Sky 2 Budget Flexibility:
see Part G of the General Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 JU Work Plan.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
Clean Sky 2 Joint Technical Programme
Clean Sky 2 JU Financial Rules
Clean Sky 2 JU Regulation of establishment
Clean Sky 2 Summary list of topics in the call 2014
Clean Sky 2 Joint Technical Programme
Clean Sky 2 JU Financial Rules
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[ECSEL JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the Annexes of the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold:
Part H of the Annexes of the ECSEL JU Work Plan describes the details of the evaluation and selection process. The evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold are also described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: described in the ECSEL JU Calls – Guide for applicants.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
The proposal templates to be filled in will be available in the submission system. The templates below serve only as examples.
ECSEL Research and Innovation Action (ECSEL-RIA):
Specific provisions and funding rates described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
ECSEL Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
ECSEL Innovation Action (ECSEL-IA):
Specific provisions and funding rates described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
ECSEL Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information - described in Annex D of the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – the definitions described in Annex C of the ECSEL JU Work Plan apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – the provisions described in Annex E of the ECSEL JU Work Plan apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
ECSEL JU Call fiche
ECSEL JU Multi Annual Strategic Plan
ECSEL JU – Regulation of establishment
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[FCH JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in in part B and C of the Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in part E of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: described in the FCH2 Guide for applicants on submission and evaluation.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
FCH2 Research and Innovation Action (FCH2-RIA):
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
FCH2 Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
FCH2 Innovation Action (FCH2-IA):
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
FCH2 Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
FCH JU budget flexibility is described in the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Technology readiness levels (TRL): described in part E of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
FCH2 JU Work Plan
FCH2 JU Multi Annual Work Plan
FCH2 JU – Regulation of establishment
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[IMI JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in article 10(2) of Regulation N° 1290/2013 of 11 December 2013 laying down the rules for participation and dissemination in Horizon 2020 and in article 1 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) N° 622/2014 of 14 February 2014.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the IMI2 Manual for evaluation, submission and grant award. See also the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) N° 622/2014 of 14 February 2014.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
Submission and evaluation process, including evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold are described in the IMI2 Manual for submission, evaluation and grant award.
See also the proposal templates for your specific action in section 6, below.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of one-stage evaluation: maximum 2 months from the final date for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 1 month from the date of informing successful applicants.
Notification of outcomes of stage 1 evaluations: Maximum 5 months from deadline for submitting proposals.
Notification of outcomes of stage 2 evaluations: Maximum 2 months from deadline for submitting full proposals.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 2 months from the date of informing successful applicants.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
IMI2 Research and Innovation Action (IMI2-RIA) and (IMI2-IA):
Summary of the most relevant provisions for participating in IMI2 actions
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
IMI2 Model Grant Agreement
MI2 Coordination and Support Action (IMI2-CSA):
Summary of the most relevant provisions for participating in IMI2 actions
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
IMI2 Model Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
IMI2 Call Fiche
IMI2 Work Plan
IMI JU derogation to H2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[SESAR JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in Annex of the ad hoc financing decision.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the Annex of the ad hoc financing decision and part B of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the SJU proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in the Annex of the ad hoc financing decision and in the SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research: Call for Research Projects.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
For the applicable thresholds to this Exploratory Research Call for Proposals, please refer to point 3.1 above.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
Research and Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in ad hoc financing decision
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
SJU evaluation form
SJU Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) . Please also refer to the document SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research: Call for Research Projects.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions and proposals must refer to measures envisaged.
SJU additional documents
SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research: Call for Research Projects
SJU Annual Work Programme
ATM Master Plan
Second draft of the SESAR 2020 R&I Programme ed. 0.21 dated 07 July 2014
Project Execution Guidance for SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research
Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[Shift2Rail JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the main H2020 Work Programme.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the main H2020 Work Programme and in the Shift2Rail Annual Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the main H2020 Work Programme and in the Shift2Rail Annual Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
Proposal templates for members and non-members are available after entering the submission tool below.
Multi-Beneficiary Model Grant Agreement
Mono-Beneficiary Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents
Shift2Rail JU Annual Work Plan
Shift2Rail Master Plan
Shift2Rail Multi Annual Action Plan (MAAP)
Shift2Rail Establishment Regulation
Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects. See the information in the Online Manual.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
The conditions specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) are described in the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
The award criteria and evaluation procedure specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) is described in the MSCA section of the General Work Programme.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Informatio... Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects. See the information in the Online Manual.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
The conditions specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) are described in the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
The award criteria and evaluation procedure specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) is described in the MSCA section of the General Work Programme.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
[SME instrument, ToA SME-1]:
Information on the outcome of phase 1 of the SME Instrument: maximum 2 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 3 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[SME instrument, ToA SME-2]:
Information on the outcome of phase 2 of the SME Instrument: maximum 4 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 6 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[FET multiple cut-off]:
Information on the outcome of evaluation: maximum 5 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[FTI multiple cut-off]:
Information on the outcome: maximum 3 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 6 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
Research and Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Coordination and Support Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
SME instrument (phase 1):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA SME Ph1 - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA SME Ph1 – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
SME instrument (phase 2):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA SME Ph2 - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA SME Ph2 – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
ERA-NET Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA ERA-NET Cofund - Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Thematic clusters of previous ERA-NET projects
Practical guidance how to organise ERA-NET joint calls
Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Grant Agreement
Specific requirements for innovation procurement supported by Horizon 2020 grants (PCP, PPI)
Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions (PPI):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Grant Agreement
Specific requirements for innovation procurement supported by Horizon 2020 grants (PCP, PP)
European Joint Programme (EJP):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA EJP Cofund – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Framework Partnership Agreement:
Specific provisions and funding rates (FPA & SGA)
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA Framework Partnership - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Framework Partnership - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Specific – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Specific – Mono-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
[MSC types of action]:
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA IF)
European Fellowships:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC IF – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA IF)
Global Fellowships:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC IF – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Training Networks:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Industrial Doctorates:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Anotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Joint Doctorates:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN – Multi--Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE):
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC RISE – Multi--Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Co-funding of regional, national and international programmes (COFUND)
Doctoral programmes:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC COFUND - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Co-funding of regional, national and international programmes (COFUND)
Fellowship programmes:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC COFUND - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – where a topic description foresees financial support to Third Parties, these provisions apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
[Topics participating in the open access to research data pilot]
This topic participates per default in the open access to research data pilot which aims to improve and maximise access to and re-use of research data generated by projects:
- The pilot applies to the data needed to validate the results presented in scientific publications. Additionally, projects can choose to make other data available for open access and need to describe their approach in a Data Management Plan (to be provided within six months after the project start).
- Note that the evaluation phase proposals will not be evaluated more favourably because they are part of the Pilot, and will not be penalised for opting out of the Pilot.
- Projects can at any stage opt-out of the pilot.
The legal requirements for projects participating in this pilot are in the article 29.3 of the Model Grant Agreement.
Further information on the Open Research Data Pilot is made available in the H2020 Online Manual.
Additional documents:
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Introduction
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Future and Emerging Technologies (FETs)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Marie Sklodowska-Curie actions (MSCA)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Research infrastructures (including e-Infrastructures)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Introduction to Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies (LEITs)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Information and communication technologies (ICT)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Nanotechnologies, advanced materials, advanced manufacturing and processing, biotechnology
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Space
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Access to risk finance
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Innovation in SMEs
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Health, demographic change and wellbeing
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Food security, sustainable agriculture and forestry, marine and maritime and inland water research and the bioeconomy
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Secure, clean and efficient energy
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Smart, green and integrated transport
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Climate action, environment, resource efficiency and raw materials
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Europe in a changing world - inclusive, innovative and reflective societies
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Secure societies – protecting freedom and security of Europe and its citizens
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Spreading excellence and widening participation
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Science with and for society
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Cross-cutting activities (Focus Areas)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Fast Track to Innovation Pilot
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Dissemination, Exploitation and Evaluation
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: General Annexes
Euratom Work Programme 2016-17
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Euratom Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[ERC – 2017 topic conditions template]
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: the conditions specific to the ERC are described in the ERC 2017 Work Programme under the heading 'Eligibility criteria' and in 'Annex 3'. An overview is provided below:
The ERC actions are open to researchers of any nationality who intend to conduct their research activity in any EU Member State or H2020 Associated Country. Principal Investigators may be of any age and nationality and may reside in any country in the world at the time of the application. ERC Principal Investigators do not have to be based full-time in Europe.
The host institution must either be established in an EU Member State or H2020 Associated Country as a legal entity created under national law, or it may be an International European Interest Organisation (such as CERN, EMBL, etc.), the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) or any other entity created under EU law.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions:
The conditions specific to ERC grants are described in the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the heading 'Eligibility criteria' and in the ERC Rules for Submission and Evaluation under Section 2.4. An overview is provided below:
Eligible proposals:
Eligible Principal Investigator:
Eligible Host Institution:
Restrictions on submission of proposals:
Proposal page limits and layout: A complete proposal is composed of:
• Administrative Proposal Submission forms (including Ethics Review Table) are available in the submission tool below – registration to Participant Portal is required first.
• The Research Proposal (Parts B1 and B2), also available in the submission tool, should be uploaded and submitted via the submission tool as PDF files.
Proposal Part B1
Extended Synopsis: max. 5 pages (please note that references do not count towards the page limits)
Curriculum Vitae: max. 2 pages
Funding ID: no page limits
Track Record: max. 2 pages
Proposal Part B2
Scientific Proposal: max. 15 pages (please note that references do not count towards the page limit)
• Host Institution Binding Statement of Support (available on this page below and as a word-template in PPSS).
• Ethics review self-assessment (if applicable) and supporting documentation.
Evaluation
The conditions specific to ERC are described in the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the heading 'Evaluation procedure and criteria' and in the ERC Rules for Submission and Evaluation. An overview is provided below:
Evaluation procedure
A single submission of the full proposal will be followed by a two-step evaluation. The evaluation will be conducted by means of a structure of high level peer review panels as listed in Annex 1 of the ERC Work Programme 2017. The panels may be assisted by independent experts working remotely.
Evaluation criteria
For all ERC frontier research grants excellence is the sole criterion of evaluation. It will be applied in conjunction to the evaluation of both: the ground-breaking nature, ambition and feasibility of the research project; and the intellectual capacity, creativity and commitment of the Principal Investigator. The detailed evaluation elements applying to the excellence of the research project and the Principal Investigator are set out in the ERC Work Programme 2017.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the heading 'Indicative summary of main calls from the 2017 budget'.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
ERC Starting Grant
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Starting Grant profile'.
Information for the applicants of the Starting and Consolidator Grants
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
ERC Guide for Peer Reviewers – STG, COG, ADG
H2020 ERC MGA – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
ERC Consolidator Grant
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Consolidator Grant profile'.
Information for the applicants of the Starting and Consolidator Grants
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
ERC Guide for Peer Reviewers – STG, COG, ADG
H2020 ERC MGA – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
ERC Advanced Grant
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Advanced Grant profile'.
Information for the applicants of the Advanced Grants
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
ERC Guide for Peer Reviewers – STG, COG, ADG
H2020 ERC MGA – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
ERC Proof of Concept Grant
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2017 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Proof of Concept Grant profile'.
Information for the applicants of the Proof of Concept Grants
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
ERC Guide for Peer Reviewers – POC
H2020 ERC MGA PoC - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA PoC - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Open access
The ERC supports the principle of open access to the published output of research, including in particular peer-reviewed articles and monographs, as a fundamental part of its mission. It also supports the basic principle of open access to research data and data related products such as computer code. The ERC considers that providing free online access to all these materials can be the most effective way of ensuring that the fruits of the research it funds can be accessed, read and used as the basis for further research.
Under Horizon 2020, beneficiaries of ERC grants must ensure open access to all peer-reviewed scientific publications relating to their results as set out in Article 29.2 of the ERC Model Grant Agreement.
In addition, for the first time under Horizon 2020, beneficiaries of ERC frontier research grants funded under this Work Programme will automatically be covered by the provisions on research data sharing as set out in Article 29.3 of the ERC Model Grant Agreement unless they specifically decide to opt-out. Beneficiaries that do not opt-out should also ensure appropriate management (including preservation and curation) of the research data they generate in order to ensure its sustainability. These provisions are designed to facilitate access, re-use and preservation of research data generated during the ERC funded research work. For more guidance, please see the Online Manual.
Beneficiaries should carefully check the additional obligations related to open research data contained in Article 29.3. They may opt-out of the provisions of the previous paragraph at any stage, thereby freeing themselves retroactively from the associated obligations.
Additional documents:
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[Prizes – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part 8 of the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink of the Rules for Contests. Please send all the contest documents to RTD J.3 for publication and they will send you the hyperlinks to be added.
Eligibility and exclusion criteria: described in part 8 of the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to the application template.
Evaluation and award criteria and procedure: described in part 3 of the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and award of prizes:
Please add the timelines.
Application templates and evaluation forms for prizes under this topic:
Application template for inducement prizes is available after entering the submission tool below.
Evaluation form for inducement prizes
Additional provisions: described in the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink.
The general rules for Prizes are described in part F of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme
Additional documents:
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Euratom Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) – 2016 topic conditions template]
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: Described in section 7.2 of the EIT 2016 Call text for KICs proposals.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: Described in section 7 of the EIT 2016 Call text for KICs proposals.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: Described in section 7 of the EIT 2016 Call text for KICs proposals.
The three criteria are STRATEGY, OPERATIONS and IMPACT.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the EIT Proposal template 2016.
The proposal is limited to 50 pages.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and KIC designation: Described in section 7 of the EIT 2016 Call text for KICs proposals.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
EIT Proposal Evaluation form 2016
During the start-up phase, which may follow the KIC designation, the contractual relations are usually framed by:
EIT Model Start-up Grant Agreement - a multi-beneficiary agreement signed by the EIT and the designated KIC coordinator.
Once a new KIC legal entity is established, the contractual relations are framed by:
EIT Model Framework Partnership Agreement - a multi-beneficiary agreement signed by the EIT and the new KIC Legal Entity.
EIT Model Specific Grant Agreement - a multi-beneficiary agreement signed by the EIT and the new KIC Legal Entity.
Additional documents:
Framework of Guidance - provides additional information about characteristics of a successful KIC.
EIT principles for financing, monitoring and evaluating KIC activities
KICs background information
EIT Strategic and Innovation Agenda (EIT SIA) which also includes Advanced Manufacturing and Food4Future Factsheets
EIT regulation and its Amendment
EIT financial regulation and its Amendment
[BBI JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme, with the exceptions described in part 3.5.7 of the BBI JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process and the BBI JU Calls - Guide for applicants (RIA-IA-CSA).
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
BBI Research and Innovation Action (BBI-RIA)
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the Annex of the BBI JU Annual Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
BBI JU Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
BBI Innovation Action Demonstration (BBI-IA-DEMO)
and BBI Innovation Action Flagship (BBI-IA-FLAG)
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the Annex of the BBI JU Annual Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form (FLAG)
Standard evaluation form (DEMO)
BBI JU Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
BBI Coordination and Support Action (BBI-CSA)
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the Annex of the BBI JU Annual Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
BBI JU Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Technology readiness levels (TRL) apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents
BBI JU Call fiche
BBI JU Work Plan
BBI JU Scientific Innovation and Research Agenda (SIRA)
Horizon 2020 Rules for participation
BBI JU Derogation to H2020 Rules for Participation
BBI JU Regulation of establishment
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[Clean Sky calls – 2016 topics conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in Part A of the General Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B & C of the general Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part F of the General Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process:
described in the Clean Sky 2 Rules for submission, evaluation, selection, award and review procedures of calls for Core Partners.
described in the Clean Sky 2 Rules for submission, evaluation, selection, award and review procedures of calls for proposals.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement: maximum 8 months from the date of closure of the call.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
The proposal templates will be available in the submission system. The templates below serve only as examples.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
H2020 Clean Sky 2 JU MGA for Members
H2020 Clean Sky 2 JU MGA for Partners - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Clean Sky 2 JU MGA for Partners - Mono-Beneficiary
Additional provisions:
Clean Sky 2 Budget Flexibility:
see Part G of the General Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 JU Work Plan.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
Clean Sky 2 Joint Technical Programme
Clean Sky 2 JU Financial Rules
Clean Sky 2 JU Regulation of establishment
Clean Sky 2 Summary list of topics in the call 2014
Clean Sky 2 Joint Technical Programme
Clean Sky 2 JU Financial Rules
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[ECSEL JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the Annexes of the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold:
Part H of the Annexes of the ECSEL JU Work Plan describes the details of the evaluation and selection process. The evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold are also described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: described in the ECSEL JU Calls – Guide for applicants.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
The proposal templates to be filled in will be available in the submission system. The templates below serve only as examples.
ECSEL Research and Innovation Action (ECSEL-RIA):
Specific provisions and funding rates described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
ECSEL Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
ECSEL Innovation Action (ECSEL-IA):
Specific provisions and funding rates described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
ECSEL Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information - described in Annex D of the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – the definitions described in Annex C of the ECSEL JU Work Plan apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – the provisions described in Annex E of the ECSEL JU Work Plan apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
ECSEL JU Call fiche
ECSEL JU Multi Annual Strategic Plan
ECSEL JU – Regulation of establishment
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[FCH JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in in part B and C of the Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in part E of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: described in the FCH2 Guide for applicants on submission and evaluation.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
FCH2 Research and Innovation Action (FCH2-RIA):
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
FCH2 Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
FCH2 Innovation Action (FCH2-IA):
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
FCH2 Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
FCH JU budget flexibility is described in the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Technology readiness levels (TRL): described in part E of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
FCH2 JU Work Plan
FCH2 JU Multi Annual Work Plan
FCH2 JU – Regulation of establishment
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[IMI JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in article 10(2) of Regulation N° 1290/2013 of 11 December 2013 laying down the rules for participation and dissemination in Horizon 2020 and in article 1 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) N° 622/2014 of 14 February 2014.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the IMI2 Manual for evaluation, submission and grant award. See also the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) N° 622/2014 of 14 February 2014.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
Submission and evaluation process, including evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold are described in the IMI2 Manual for submission, evaluation and grant award.
See also the proposal templates for your specific action in section 6, below.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of one-stage evaluation: maximum 2 months from the final date for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 1 month from the date of informing successful applicants.
Notification of outcomes of stage 1 evaluations: Maximum 5 months from deadline for submitting proposals.
Notification of outcomes of stage 2 evaluations: Maximum 2 months from deadline for submitting full proposals.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 2 months from the date of informing successful applicants.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
IMI2 Research and Innovation Action (IMI2-RIA) and (IMI2-IA):
Summary of the most relevant provisions for participating in IMI2 actions
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
IMI2 Model Grant Agreement
MI2 Coordination and Support Action (IMI2-CSA):
Summary of the most relevant provisions for participating in IMI2 actions
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
IMI2 Model Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
IMI2 Call Fiche
IMI2 Work Plan
IMI JU derogation to H2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[SESAR JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in Annex of the ad hoc financing decision.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the Annex of the ad hoc financing decision and part B of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the SJU proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in the Annex of the ad hoc financing decision and in the SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research: Call for Research Projects.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
For the applicable thresholds to this Exploratory Research Call for Proposals, please refer to point 3.1 above.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
Research and Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in ad hoc financing decision
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
SJU evaluation form
SJU Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) . Please also refer to the document SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research: Call for Research Projects.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions and proposals must refer to measures envisaged.
SJU additional documents
SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research: Call for Research Projects
SJU Annual Work Programme
ATM Master Plan
Second draft of the SESAR 2020 R&I Programme ed. 0.21 dated 07 July 2014
Project Execution Guidance for SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research
Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[Shift2Rail JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the main H2020 Work Programme.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the main H2020 Work Programme and in the Shift2Rail Annual Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the main H2020 Work Programme and in the Shift2Rail Annual Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
Proposal templates for members and non-members are available after entering the submission tool below.
Multi-Beneficiary Model Grant Agreement
Mono-Beneficiary Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents
Shift2Rail JU Annual Work Plan
Shift2Rail Master Plan
Shift2Rail Multi Annual Action Plan (MAAP)
Shift2Rail Establishment Regulation
Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Horizon 2020 Regulation of Establishment
Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
Garantías:
No existen condiciones financieras para el beneficiario.
Información adicional de la convocatoria
Efecto incentivador:
Esta ayuda tiene efecto incentivador, por lo que el proyecto no puede haberse iniciado antes de la presentación de la solicitud de ayuda.
+ info.
Respuesta Organismo:
Se calcula que aproximadamente, la respuesta del organismo una vez tramitada la ayuda es de:
Meses de respuesta:
Muy Competitiva:
No conocemos el presupuesto total de la línea
Minimis:
Esta línea de financiación NO considera una “ayuda de minimis”.
Puedes consultar la normativa
aquí.
Otras ventajas
Sello PYME:
Tramitar esta ayuda con éxito permite conseguir el sello de calidad de “sello pyme innovadora”. Que permite ciertas ventajas fiscales.
H2020-SFS-2016-2017
Reinforcing international cooperation on sustainable aquaculture production with countries from South-East Asia
Specific Challenge:With 90% of all world aquaculture production based in Asia, and with Europe importing close to 70% of its seafood (in par...
Sin info.
LC-SFS-20-2019
European Joint Programme on agricultural soil management
en consorcio:
Cerrada
hace 1 año
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
SFS-28-2018-2019-2020
Genetic resources and pre-breeding communities
en consorcio:
Cerrada
hace 2 años
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
SFS-10-2020
Epidemiology of non-EU-regulated contagious animal diseases: from integrated data collection to prioritisation
en consorcio:
Specific Challenge:The increasing demand for animal derived food and the mounting pressure on land and oceans is expected to push further in...
Cerrada
hace 5 años
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
SFS-40-2020
Healthy soils for healthy food production
en consorcio:
Specific Challenge:The EU and China are facing similar challenges of increasing soils health and producing more high quality food for increa...
Cerrada
hace 5 años
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
SFS-13-2020
Genome and epigenome enabled breeding in terrestrial livestock
en consorcio:
Specific Challenge:Genetics is currently one of the important levers for efficient livestock production, not only to increase performance an...
Cerrada
hace 5 años
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
Ayudas Similares
CDTI CID
| Abierta
| Abierta
Programa Tecnológico Espacial...
| Próximamente
| Próximamente
CDTI CIEN
| Abierta
| Abierta