Innovating Works
EDF-2025-LS-RA-CHALLENGE-...
EDF-2025-LS-RA-CHALLENGE-DIGIT-HAIDO: Privacy-preserving human-AI dialogue systems – Organisation of a technological challenge
Expected Impact:The outcome should contribute to:
Sólo fondo perdido 7M €
Europeo
Esta convocatoria está abierta temporalmente Convocatoria de ayuda abierta temporalmente del 18-02-2025 hasta el 15-10-2025.
Esta ayuda tiene otras 2 convocatoria(s) que puedes consultar.
Presentación: Consorcio Consorcio: Esta ayuda está diseñada para aplicar a ella en formato consorcio.
Número mínimo de participantes.
Esta ayuda financia Proyectos: Objetivo del proyecto:

Expected Impact:The outcome should contribute to:

Standardisation of testing for dialogue systems.Enhanced clarity on the performances of dialogue systems for all stakeholders, including system developers, funders, and users.Community building at the European defence level.Trustworthy dialogue systems that enhance operational decision-making.Availability of databases to further develop dialogue systems. Objective:Human-AI dialogue systems offer impressive results but are still prone to errors of various types. Moreover, there is no established metric to measure system performances. In order to ensure trustworthiness and steer progress, these systems should be submitted to common tests using shared data and clear metrics and protocols.

The goal of this call topic is thus to set up a testing environment and organise a technological challenge to evaluate the performances of such systems for defence use cases, including their abilities to manage classified information and to justify their answers. The challenge should be open to research teams supported through another call topic (EDF-2025-LS-RA-CHALLENGE-DIGIT-HAIDP) and possibly by other sources of funding.... ver más

Expected Impact:The outcome should contribute to:

Standardisation of testing for dialogue systems.Enhanced clarity on the performances of dialogue systems for all stakeholders, including system developers, funders, and users.Community building at the European defence level.Trustworthy dialogue systems that enhance operational decision-making.Availability of databases to further develop dialogue systems. Objective:Human-AI dialogue systems offer impressive results but are still prone to errors of various types. Moreover, there is no established metric to measure system performances. In order to ensure trustworthiness and steer progress, these systems should be submitted to common tests using shared data and clear metrics and protocols.

The goal of this call topic is thus to set up a testing environment and organise a technological challenge to evaluate the performances of such systems for defence use cases, including their abilities to manage classified information and to justify their answers. The challenge should be open to research teams supported through another call topic (EDF-2025-LS-RA-CHALLENGE-DIGIT-HAIDP) and possibly by other sources of funding. Representative defence users should be involved to contribute to the definition of the use cases and associated data, to test the demonstrators produced by the participating teams, and to provide feedback.

Scope:The proposals should address the organisation of a technological challenge on human-AI dialogue based on the preliminary evaluation plan provided as part of the call document (cf. Annex 4). This includes the collection, annotation and distribution of data, the elaboration of evaluation plans and metrics, the measurement of system performances, and the organisation of debriefing workshops.

Types of activities

The following types of activities are eligible for this topic:

Types of activities

(art 10(3) EDF Regulation)

Eligible?

(a)

Activities that aim to create, underpin and improve knowledge, products and technologies, including disruptive technologies, which can achieve significant effects in the area of defence (generating knowledge)

Yes

(optional)

(b)

Activities that aim to increase interoperability and resilience, including secured production and exchange of data, to master critical defence technologies, to strengthen the security of supply or to enable the effective exploitation of results for defence products and technologies (integrating knowledge)

Yes

(mandatory)

(c)

Studies, such as feasibility studies to explore the feasibility of new or upgraded products, technologies, processes, services and solutions

Yes

(optional)

(d)

Design of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology as well as the definition of the technical specifications on which such design has been developed, including partial tests for risk reduction in an industrial or representative environment

Yes

(optional)

(e)

System prototyping of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology

No

(f)

Testing of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology

No

(g)

Qualification of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology

No

(h)

Certification of a defence product, tangible or intangible component or technology

No

(i)

Development of technologies or assets increasing efficiency across the life cycle of defence products and technologies

No

The proposals must cover at least the following tasks as part of mandatory activities:

Integrating knowledge: Setting-up of the infrastructure for testing human-AI dialogue systems in the framework of the technological challenge.Elaboration of data annotation guidelines, collection and annotation of data, quality assessment, distribution and curation of databases.Organisation of the evaluation campaigns, and in particular. coordination of the exchanges with the participating teams and any other relevant stakeholders on the evaluation plans and elaboration of these plans.management of the experimental test campaigns and of the objective measurements of the performances of the systems submitted to the tests by the participating teams according to the protocols and metrics described in the evaluation plans.organisation of the debriefing workshops. The proposals should include descriptions of work packages, tasks and deliverables that enable a clear assessment of work package completion. These should include the production of detailed evaluation plans agreed upon by all stakeholders, the production of the annotated databases needed for the evaluations, the production of measurements for all systems submitted to the tests by the participating teams following these plans, and the organisation of the needed events.

Functional requirements

The proposed solutions should enable the measurement of the performances of dialogue systems according to detailed evaluation plans based on the preliminary evaluation plan provided as part of the call document (cf. Annex 4). Key aspects of the foreseen detailed evaluation plans and associated data management should be described in the proposals. The proposals should in particular describe:

the scenarios considered.the languages that can be covered for each evaluation campaign.the nature and volume of data annotation to be produced, and in particular how the data is representative of defence use cases.a detailed plan of the test campaigns and an overall timeline/Gantt chart of the technological challenge.the evaluation procedures (rules and tools to implement the metrics) and significance tests to be performed on measurements. A user board consisting of representative defence users should be set up and involved in live tests. The proposals should describe the foreseen efforts from users to test demonstrators and provide feedback.

During the challenge, detailed evaluation plans should be prepared for each evaluation campaign. Drafts of these detailed evaluation plans should be submitted for discussion to the participating teams, early enough to take into account the feedback for the actual evaluation campaigns. Any evolution of the evaluation plans should take into account several factors: technical possibilities and cost, scientific relevance of the measurement, and representativeness of the metrics and protocols with respect to military needs.

More generally, the user board and the participating teams should be involved in the steering of the technological challenge. The proposals should include a clear description of the foreseen governance and decision-making processes at the technological challenge level.

ver menos

Temáticas Obligatorias del proyecto: Temática principal:

Características del consorcio

Ámbito Europeo : La ayuda es de ámbito europeo, puede aplicar a esta linea cualquier empresa que forme parte de la Comunidad Europea.
Tipo y tamaño de organizaciones: El diseño de consorcio necesario para la tramitación de esta ayuda necesita de:

Características del Proyecto

Requisitos de diseño: Duración:
Requisitos técnicos: Expected Impact:The outcome should contribute to: Expected Impact:The outcome should contribute to:
Capítulos financiables: Los capítulos de gastos financiables para esta línea son:
Personnel costs.
Los costes de personal subvencionables cubren las horas de trabajo efectivo de las personas directamente dedicadas a la ejecución de la acción. Los propietarios de pequeñas y medianas empresas que no perciban salario y otras personas físicas que no perciban salario podrán imputar los costes de personal sobre la base de una escala de costes unitarios
Purchase costs.
Los otros costes directos se dividen en los siguientes apartados: Viajes, amortizaciones, equipamiento y otros bienes y servicios. Se financia la amortización de equipos, permitiendo incluir la amortización de equipos adquiridos antes del proyecto si se registra durante su ejecución. En el apartado de otros bienes y servicios se incluyen los diferentes bienes y servicios comprados por los beneficiarios a proveedores externos para poder llevar a cabo sus tareas
Subcontracting costs.
La subcontratación en ayudas europeas no debe tratarse del core de actividades de I+D del proyecto. El contratista debe ser seleccionado por el beneficiario de acuerdo con el principio de mejor relación calidad-precio bajo las condiciones de transparencia e igualdad (en ningún caso consistirá en solicitar menos de 3 ofertas). En el caso de entidades públicas, para la subcontratación se deberán de seguir las leyes que rijan en el país al que pertenezca el contratante
Amortizaciones.
Activos.
Otros Gastos.
Madurez tecnológica: La tramitación de esta ayuda requiere de un nivel tecnológico mínimo en el proyecto de TRL 5:. Los elementos básicos de la innovación son integrados de manera que la configuración final es similar a su aplicación final, es decir que está listo para ser usado en la simulación de un entorno real. Se mejoran los modelos tanto técnicos como económicos del diseño inicial, se ha identificado adicionalmente aspectos de seguridad, limitaciones ambiéntales y/o regulatorios entre otros. + info.
TRL esperado:

Características de la financiación

Intensidad de la ayuda: Sólo fondo perdido + info
Fondo perdido:
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
Conditions1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layoutdescribed in section 5 of the call document.
Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
2. Eligible Countriesdescribed in section 6 of the call document.
3. Other Eligible Conditionsdescribed in section 6 of the call document.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusiondescribed in section 7 of the call document.
5a. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processesdescribed section 8 of the call document and the Online Manual.
5b. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholdsdescribed in section 9 of the call document.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreementdescribed in section 4 of the call document.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grantsdescribed in section 10 of the call document.
Call document and annexes: Call document
Application form templates
Standard application form (EDF) — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Detailed budget table (EDF LS RA)
Participant information (EDF)
List of infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources (EDF)
Actual indirect cost methodology declaration (EDF)
Ownership control declaration 
PRS declaration (EDF) 
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
EDF, ASAP and EDIRPA Lump Sum MG...
Conditions1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layoutdescribed in section 5 of the call document.
Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
2. Eligible Countriesdescribed in section 6 of the call document.
3. Other Eligible Conditionsdescribed in section 6 of the call document.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusiondescribed in section 7 of the call document.
5a. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processesdescribed section 8 of the call document and the Online Manual.
5b. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholdsdescribed in section 9 of the call document.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreementdescribed in section 4 of the call document.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grantsdescribed in section 10 of the call document.
Call document and annexes: Call document
Application form templates
Standard application form (EDF) — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Detailed budget table (EDF LS RA)
Participant information (EDF)
List of infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources (EDF)
Actual indirect cost methodology declaration (EDF)
Ownership control declaration 
PRS declaration (EDF) 
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
EDF, ASAP and EDIRPA Lump Sum MGA 
Additional documents: EDF Annual Work Programme
EDF Regulation 2021/697
EDF Programme Security Instruction (PSI)
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment 
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement 
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual 
Funding & Tenders Portal Terms and Conditions 
Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement
Garantías:
No exige Garantías
No existen condiciones financieras para el beneficiario.

Información adicional de la convocatoria

Efecto incentivador: Esta ayuda tiene efecto incentivador, por lo que el proyecto no puede haberse iniciado antes de la presentación de la solicitud de ayuda. + info.
Respuesta Organismo: Se calcula que aproximadamente, la respuesta del organismo una vez tramitada la ayuda es de:
Meses de respuesta:
Muy Competitiva:
No Competitiva Competitiva Muy Competitiva
El presupuesto total de la convocatoria asciende a
Presupuesto total de la convocatoria.
Minimis: Esta línea de financiación NO considera una “ayuda de minimis”. Puedes consultar la normativa aquí.

Otras ventajas

Sello PYME: Tramitar esta ayuda con éxito permite conseguir el sello de calidad de “sello pyme innovadora”. Que permite ciertas ventajas fiscales.
EDF-2025-LS-RA-CHALLENGE-DIGIT-HAIDO Privacy-preserving human-AI dialogue systems – Organisation of a technological challenge
en consorcio: Expected Impact:The outcome should contribute to: Standardisation of testing for dialogue systems.Enhanced clarity on the performances of d...
Abierta | Desde 18-02-2025 Hasta el 15-10-2025
EDF-2025-LS-RA-CHALLENGE-DIGIT-HAIDP-STEP Privacy-preserving human-AI dialogue systems – Participation in a technological challenge
en consorcio: Expected Impact:The outcome should contribute to: A strengthened EDTIB (European Defence Technological and Industrial Base) and enhanced te...
Abierta | Desde 18-02-2025 Hasta el 15-10-2025