HORIZON EUROPE
Cerrada
EE-05-2016
EE-05-2016:
Models and tools for heating and cooling mapping and planning
Europeo
Sólo fondo perdido
0 €
Europeo
Esta convocatoria está cerrada
Esta línea ya está cerrada por lo que no puedes aplicar. Cerró el pasado día 21-01-2016.
Se espera una próxima convocatoria para esta ayuda, aún no está clara la fecha exacta de inicio de convocatoria.
Por suerte, hemos conseguido la lista de proyectos financiados!
Presentación:
Consorcio
Consorcio:
Esta ayuda está diseñada para aplicar a ella en formato consorcio.
Número mínimo de participantes.
Esta ayuda financia
Proyectos:
Objetivo del proyecto:
Características del consorcio
Ámbito Europeo :
La ayuda es de ámbito europeo, puede aplicar a esta linea cualquier empresa que forme parte de la Comunidad Europea.
:
La ayuda es de ámbito europeo, puede aplicar a esta linea cualquier empresa que forme parte de la Comunidad Europea.
Tipo y tamaño de organizaciones:
El diseño de consorcio necesario para la tramitación de esta ayuda necesita de:
Características del Proyecto
Requisitos de diseño:
Duración:
¿Quieres ejemplos? Puedes consultar aquí los últimos proyectos conocidos financiados por esta línea, sus tecnologías, sus presupuestos y sus compañías.
Capítulos financiables:
Los capítulos de gastos financiables para esta línea son:
Personnel costs.
Los costes de personal subvencionables cubren las horas de trabajo efectivo de las personas directamente dedicadas a la ejecución de la acción. Los propietarios de pequeñas y medianas empresas que no perciban salario y otras personas físicas que no perciban salario podrán imputar los costes de personal sobre la base de una escala de costes unitarios
Los costes de personal subvencionables cubren las horas de trabajo efectivo de las personas directamente dedicadas a la ejecución de la acción. Los propietarios de pequeñas y medianas empresas que no perciban salario y otras personas físicas que no perciban salario podrán imputar los costes de personal sobre la base de una escala de costes unitarios
Purchase costs.
Los otros costes directos se dividen en los siguientes apartados: Viajes, amortizaciones, equipamiento y otros bienes y servicios. Se financia la amortización de equipos, permitiendo incluir la amortización de equipos adquiridos antes del proyecto si se registra durante su ejecución. En el apartado de otros bienes y servicios se incluyen los diferentes bienes y servicios comprados por los beneficiarios a proveedores externos para poder llevar a cabo sus tareas
Los otros costes directos se dividen en los siguientes apartados: Viajes, amortizaciones, equipamiento y otros bienes y servicios. Se financia la amortización de equipos, permitiendo incluir la amortización de equipos adquiridos antes del proyecto si se registra durante su ejecución. En el apartado de otros bienes y servicios se incluyen los diferentes bienes y servicios comprados por los beneficiarios a proveedores externos para poder llevar a cabo sus tareas
Subcontracting costs.
La subcontratación en ayudas europeas no debe tratarse del core de actividades de I+D del proyecto. El contratista debe ser seleccionado por el beneficiario de acuerdo con el principio de mejor relación calidad-precio bajo las condiciones de transparencia e igualdad (en ningún caso consistirá en solicitar menos de 3 ofertas). En el caso de entidades públicas, para la subcontratación se deberán de seguir las leyes que rijan en el país al que pertenezca el contratante
La subcontratación en ayudas europeas no debe tratarse del core de actividades de I+D del proyecto. El contratista debe ser seleccionado por el beneficiario de acuerdo con el principio de mejor relación calidad-precio bajo las condiciones de transparencia e igualdad (en ningún caso consistirá en solicitar menos de 3 ofertas). En el caso de entidades públicas, para la subcontratación se deberán de seguir las leyes que rijan en el país al que pertenezca el contratante
Amortizaciones.
Activos.
Otros Gastos.
Madurez tecnológica:
La tramitación de esta ayuda requiere de un nivel tecnológico mínimo en el proyecto de TRL 5:.
Los elementos básicos de la innovación son integrados de manera que la configuración final es similar a su aplicación final, es decir que está listo para ser usado en la simulación de un entorno real. Se mejoran los modelos tanto técnicos como económicos del diseño inicial, se ha identificado adicionalmente aspectos de seguridad, limitaciones ambiéntales y/o regulatorios entre otros. + info.
Características de la financiación
Intensidad de la ayuda:
Sólo fondo perdido
+ info
Fondo perdido:
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects. See the information in the Online Manual.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
The conditions specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) are described in the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
The award criteria and evaluation procedure specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) is described in the MSCA section of the General Work Programme.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Informatio... Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects. See the information in the Online Manual.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
The conditions specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) are described in the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
The award criteria and evaluation procedure specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) is described in the MSCA section of the General Work Programme.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
[SME instrument, ToA SME-1]:
Information on the outcome of phase 1 of the SME Instrument: maximum 2 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 3 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[SME instrument, ToA SME-2]:
Information on the outcome of phase 2 of the SME Instrument: maximum 4 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 6 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[FET multiple cut-off]:
Information on the outcome of evaluation: maximum 5 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[FTI multiple cut-off]:
Information on the outcome: maximum 3 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 6 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
Research and Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Coordination and Support Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
SME instrument (phase 1):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA SME Ph1 - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA SME Ph1 – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
SME instrument (phase 2):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA SME Ph2 - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA SME Ph2 – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
ERA-NET Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA ERA-NET Cofund - Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Thematic clusters of previous ERA-NET projects
Practical guidance how to organise ERA-NET joint calls
Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Grant Agreement
Specific requirements for innovation procurement supported by Horizon 2020 grants (PCP, PPI)
Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions (PPI):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Grant Agreement
Specific requirements for innovation procurement supported by Horizon 2020 grants (PCP, PP)
European Joint Programme (EJP):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA EJP Cofund – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Framework Partnership Agreement:
Specific provisions and funding rates (FPA & SGA)
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA Framework Partnership - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Framework Partnership - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Specific – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Specific – Mono-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
[MSC types of action]:
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA IF)
European Fellowships:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC IF – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA IF)
Global Fellowships:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC IF – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Training Networks:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Industrial Doctorates:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Anotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Joint Doctorates:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN – Multi--Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE):
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC RISE – Multi--Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Co-funding of regional, national and international programmes (COFUND)
Doctoral programmes:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC COFUND - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Co-funding of regional, national and international programmes (COFUND)
Fellowship programmes:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC COFUND - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – where a topic description foresees financial support to Third Parties, these provisions apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
[Topics participating in the open access to research data pilot]
This topic participates per default in the open access to research data pilot which aims to improve and maximise access to and re-use of research data generated by projects:
- The pilot applies to the data needed to validate the results presented in scientific publications. Additionally, projects can choose to make other data available for open access and need to describe their approach in a Data Management Plan
(to be provided within six months after the project start).
- Note that the evaluation phase proposals will not be evaluated more favourably because they are part of the Pilot, and will not be penalised for opting out of the Pilot.
- Projects can at any stage opt-out of the pilot.
The legal requirements for projects participating in this pilot are in the article 29.3 of the Model Grant Agreement.
Further information on the Open Research Data Pilot is made available in the H2020 Online Manual.
Additional documents:
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Introduction
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Future and Emerging Technologies (FETs)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Marie Sklodowska-Curie actions (MSCA)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Research infrastructures (including e-Infrastructures)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Introduction to Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies (LEITs)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Information and communication technologies (ICT)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Nanotechnologies, advanced materials, advanced manufacturing and processing, biotechnology
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Space
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Access to risk finance
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Innovation in SMEs
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Health, demographic change and wellbeing
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Food security, sustainable agriculture and forestry, marine and maritime and inland water research and the bioeconomy
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Secure, clean and efficient energy
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Smart, green and integrated transport
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Climate action, environment, resource efficiency and raw materials
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Europe in a changing world - inclusive, innovative and reflective societies
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Secure societies – protecting freedom and security of Europe and its citizens
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Spreading excellence and widening participation
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Science with and for society
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Cross-cutting activities (Focus Areas)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Fast Track to Innovation Pilot
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Dissemination, Exploitation and Evaluation
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: General Annexes
Euratom Work Programme 2016-17
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Euratom Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[ERC – 2018 topic conditions template]
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: The conditions specific to the ERC are described in the ERC 2018 Work Programme under the heading 'Eligibility criteria' and in 'Annex 3'. An overview is provided below:
The ERC actions are open to researchers of any nationality who intend to conduct their research activity in any EU Member State or H2020 Associated Country. Principal Investigators may be of any age and nationality and may reside in any country in the world at the time of the application. ERC Principal Investigators do not have to be based full-time in Europe.
The host institution must either be established in an EU Member State or H2020 Associated Country as a legal entity created under national law, or it may be an International European Interest Organisation (such as CERN, EMBL, etc.), the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) or any other entity created under EU law.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions:
The conditions specific to ERC grants are described in the ERC Work Programme 2018 under the heading 'Eligibility criteria' and in the ERC Rules for Submission and Evaluation under Section 2.4. An overview is provided below:
Eligible proposals: All proposals must be complete and submitted before the relevant call deadline. A complete proposal needs to include all parts or sections (see “Proposal submission and description” below). Incomplete proposals may be declared ineligible. The content of the proposal must relate to the objectives and to the grant type set out in the call, as defined in ERC Work Programme 2018. A proposal will only be deemed ineligible on grounds of ‘scope’ in clear-cut cases.
For Starting – Consolidator - Advanced – Synergy calls:
Eligible Principal Investigator: Principal Investigators may be of any age and nationality and may reside in any country in the world at the time of the application. All Principal Investigators funded through an ERC grants shall spend a minimum of 50% of their total working time in an EU Member State or Associated Country and a minimum of 50, 40 or 30% (for PIs of Starting, Consolidator and Advanced and/or Synergy grant respectively) of their total working time on the ERC project. Groups applying for the ERC Synergy Grant must be made up of a minimum of two and a maximum of four Principal Investigators and, as necessary, their teams. No other specific eligibility criteria are foreseen for Principal Investigators applying for the ERC Synergy Grants but only exceptional proposals are likely to be funded in what are expected to be extremely competitive calls.
One of the Principal Investigators must be designated as the Corresponding Principal Investigator, who will be the administrative contact point on behalf of the Corresponding Host Institution.
For Proof of Concept call:
Eligible Principal Investigator: All Principal Investigators in an ERC frontier research project, that is either on going or has ended (Where the duration of the project fixed in the ERC Grant Agreement has ended) less than 12 months before 1 January 2018, are eligible to participate and apply for an ERC Proof of Concept Grant.
Principal Investigators may submit only one proposal under Work Programme 2018. If multiple submissions are made at different cut-off dates under the Work Programme 2018 only the first eligible proposal will be considered.
A Principal Investigator whose proposal was rejected on the grounds of a breach of research integrity in the calls for proposals under Work Programmes 2016 or 2017 may not submit a proposal to the calls for proposals made under Work Programme 2018.
Eligible Host Institution: The host institution (Applicant Legal Entity) must engage the Principal Investigator(s) for at least the duration of the project, as defined in the grant agreement. It must either be established in an EU Member State or Associated Country as a legal entity created under national law, or it may be an International European Interest Organisation (such as CERN, EMBL, etc.), the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) or any other entity created under EU law. Any type of legal entity, public or private, including universities, research organisations and undertakings can host Principal Investigators and their teams.
In a Synergy grant up to four Host Institutions could engage a Principal Investigator. Where they bring scientific added value to the project, additional team members may also be hosted by additional legal entities which will be eligible for funding, and which may be legal entities established anywhere, including outside the European Union or Associated Countries, or international organisations. Legal entities established outside the European Union or Associated Countries shall be eligible for funding provided that their participation is deemed essential for carrying out the action.
Restrictions on submission of proposals: The restrictions for submission are related to the outcome of the evaluation in previous calls and are designed to allow unsuccessful Principal Investigators the time necessary to develop a stronger proposal. For further details please consult page 19-20 of the ERC Work Programme 2018 or the Frequently Asked Questions.
Proposal page limits and layout: A complete proposal is composed of:
• Administrative Proposal Submission forms (including Ethics Review Table): available in section 5 of the topic conditions and in the submission tool below. To access the submission tool, you need to register to the Participant Portal first.
For Starting – Consolidator – Advanced – Synergy calls:
• The Research Proposal (Parts B1 and B2), also available in the submission tool, should be uploaded and submitted via the submission tool as PDF files.
For Proof of Concept call: • •The Proposal (Part B) and any supporting documentation should be uploaded and submitted via Participant Portal Submission System as PDF files.
• Host Institution Binding Statement of Support (available on this page below and as a word-template in PPSS). Only the host institution of the Corresponding Principal Investigator must confirm its association with and its support to the project and the Corresponding Principal Investigator, listing the other participating Principal Investigators.
• Ethics review self-assessment (if applicable) and supporting documentation.
For Starting – Consolidator – Advanced – Synergy calls:
Proposal Part B1
Extended Synopsis: max. 5 pages (please note that references do not count towards the page limits)
Curriculum Vitae: max. 2 pages for each Principal Investigator
Funding ID: no page limits
Track Record: max. 2 pages for each Principal Investigator
Proposal Part B2
Scientific Proposal: max. 15 pages (references do not count towards the page limit). Exceptionally for Synergy Grant applications the resources section that is included in the Scientific Proposal will not count towards the 15 page limit.
For Proof of Concept call:
Proposal Part B:
Idea and justification on innovation potential: max. 2 pages
Expected impact of the proposed innovation: 2 pages
Proof of concept plan: 2 pages
Budget table and justification: 1 page (+ Budget Table)
Evaluation
The conditions specific to ERC are described in the ERC Work Programme 2018 under the heading 'Evaluation procedure and criteria' and in the ERC Rules for Submission and Evaluation. An overview is provided below:
Evaluation procedure
For the Starting, Consolidator and Advanced grant calls a single submission of the full proposal will be followed by a two-step evaluation. The evaluation will be conducted by means of a structure of high level peer review panels as listed in Annex 1 of the ERC Work Programme 2018. The panels may be assisted by independent experts working remotely.
For the Synergy calls, a single submission of the full proposal will be followed by a three-step evaluation, including interviews. The evaluation will be conducted by means of a structure of dedicated panels. The panels may be assisted by independent experts working remotely.
Applicant Principal Investigators can request during the electronic proposal submission that up to four specific persons should not act as an evaluator in the evaluation of their proposal.
At step 1, the extended synopsis of the scientific proposal and the Principal Investigators’ track records and CVs will be assessed (and not the full scientific proposal).
&nb
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects. See the information in the Online Manual.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
The conditions specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) are described in the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
The award criteria and evaluation procedure specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) is described in the MSCA section of the General Work Programme.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Informatio... Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects. See the information in the Online Manual.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
The conditions specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) are described in the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
The award criteria and evaluation procedure specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) is described in the MSCA section of the General Work Programme.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
[SME instrument, ToA SME-1]:
Information on the outcome of phase 1 of the SME Instrument: maximum 2 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 3 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[SME instrument, ToA SME-2]:
Information on the outcome of phase 2 of the SME Instrument: maximum 4 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 6 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[FET multiple cut-off]:
Information on the outcome of evaluation: maximum 5 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[FTI multiple cut-off]:
Information on the outcome: maximum 3 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 6 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
Research and Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Coordination and Support Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
SME instrument (phase 1):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA SME Ph1 - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA SME Ph1 – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
SME instrument (phase 2):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA SME Ph2 - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA SME Ph2 – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
ERA-NET Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA ERA-NET Cofund - Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Thematic clusters of previous ERA-NET projects
Practical guidance how to organise ERA-NET joint calls
Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Grant Agreement
Specific requirements for innovation procurement supported by Horizon 2020 grants (PCP, PPI)
Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions (PPI):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Grant Agreement
Specific requirements for innovation procurement supported by Horizon 2020 grants (PCP, PP)
European Joint Programme (EJP):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA EJP Cofund – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Framework Partnership Agreement:
Specific provisions and funding rates (FPA & SGA)
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA Framework Partnership - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Framework Partnership - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Specific – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Specific – Mono-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
[MSC types of action]:
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA IF)
European Fellowships:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC IF – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA IF)
Global Fellowships:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC IF – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Training Networks:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Industrial Doctorates:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Anotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Joint Doctorates:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN – Multi--Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE):
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC RISE – Multi--Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Co-funding of regional, national and international programmes (COFUND)
Doctoral programmes:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC COFUND - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Co-funding of regional, national and international programmes (COFUND)
Fellowship programmes:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC COFUND - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – where a topic description foresees financial support to Third Parties, these provisions apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
[Topics participating in the open access to research data pilot]
This topic participates per default in the open access to research data pilot which aims to improve and maximise access to and re-use of research data generated by projects:
- The pilot applies to the data needed to validate the results presented in scientific publications. Additionally, projects can choose to make other data available for open access and need to describe their approach in a Data Management Plan
(to be provided within six months after the project start).
- Note that the evaluation phase proposals will not be evaluated more favourably because they are part of the Pilot, and will not be penalised for opting out of the Pilot.
- Projects can at any stage opt-out of the pilot.
The legal requirements for projects participating in this pilot are in the article 29.3 of the Model Grant Agreement.
Further information on the Open Research Data Pilot is made available in the H2020 Online Manual.
Additional documents:
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Introduction
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Future and Emerging Technologies (FETs)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Marie Sklodowska-Curie actions (MSCA)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Research infrastructures (including e-Infrastructures)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Introduction to Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies (LEITs)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Information and communication technologies (ICT)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Nanotechnologies, advanced materials, advanced manufacturing and processing, biotechnology
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Space
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Access to risk finance
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Innovation in SMEs
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Health, demographic change and wellbeing
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Food security, sustainable agriculture and forestry, marine and maritime and inland water research and the bioeconomy
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Secure, clean and efficient energy
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Smart, green and integrated transport
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Climate action, environment, resource efficiency and raw materials
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Europe in a changing world - inclusive, innovative and reflective societies
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Secure societies – protecting freedom and security of Europe and its citizens
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Spreading excellence and widening participation
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Science with and for society
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Cross-cutting activities (Focus Areas)
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Fast Track to Innovation Pilot
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: Dissemination, Exploitation and Evaluation
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: General Annexes
Euratom Work Programme 2016-17
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Euratom Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Specific Programme
[ERC – 2018 topic conditions template]
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: The conditions specific to the ERC are described in the ERC 2018 Work Programme under the heading 'Eligibility criteria' and in 'Annex 3'. An overview is provided below:
The ERC actions are open to researchers of any nationality who intend to conduct their research activity in any EU Member State or H2020 Associated Country. Principal Investigators may be of any age and nationality and may reside in any country in the world at the time of the application. ERC Principal Investigators do not have to be based full-time in Europe.
The host institution must either be established in an EU Member State or H2020 Associated Country as a legal entity created under national law, or it may be an International European Interest Organisation (such as CERN, EMBL, etc.), the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) or any other entity created under EU law.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions:
The conditions specific to ERC grants are described in the ERC Work Programme 2018 under the heading 'Eligibility criteria' and in the ERC Rules for Submission and Evaluation under Section 2.4. An overview is provided below:
Eligible proposals: All proposals must be complete and submitted before the relevant call deadline. A complete proposal needs to include all parts or sections (see “Proposal submission and description” below). Incomplete proposals may be declared ineligible. The content of the proposal must relate to the objectives and to the grant type set out in the call, as defined in ERC Work Programme 2018. A proposal will only be deemed ineligible on grounds of ‘scope’ in clear-cut cases.
For Starting – Consolidator - Advanced – Synergy calls:
Eligible Principal Investigator: Principal Investigators may be of any age and nationality and may reside in any country in the world at the time of the application. All Principal Investigators funded through an ERC grants shall spend a minimum of 50% of their total working time in an EU Member State or Associated Country and a minimum of 50, 40 or 30% (for PIs of Starting, Consolidator and Advanced and/or Synergy grant respectively) of their total working time on the ERC project. Groups applying for the ERC Synergy Grant must be made up of a minimum of two and a maximum of four Principal Investigators and, as necessary, their teams. No other specific eligibility criteria are foreseen for Principal Investigators applying for the ERC Synergy Grants but only exceptional proposals are likely to be funded in what are expected to be extremely competitive calls.
One of the Principal Investigators must be designated as the Corresponding Principal Investigator, who will be the administrative contact point on behalf of the Corresponding Host Institution.
For Proof of Concept call:
Eligible Principal Investigator: All Principal Investigators in an ERC frontier research project, that is either on going or has ended (Where the duration of the project fixed in the ERC Grant Agreement has ended) less than 12 months before 1 January 2018, are eligible to participate and apply for an ERC Proof of Concept Grant.
Principal Investigators may submit only one proposal under Work Programme 2018. If multiple submissions are made at different cut-off dates under the Work Programme 2018 only the first eligible proposal will be considered.
A Principal Investigator whose proposal was rejected on the grounds of a breach of research integrity in the calls for proposals under Work Programmes 2016 or 2017 may not submit a proposal to the calls for proposals made under Work Programme 2018.
Eligible Host Institution: The host institution (Applicant Legal Entity) must engage the Principal Investigator(s) for at least the duration of the project, as defined in the grant agreement. It must either be established in an EU Member State or Associated Country as a legal entity created under national law, or it may be an International European Interest Organisation (such as CERN, EMBL, etc.), the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) or any other entity created under EU law. Any type of legal entity, public or private, including universities, research organisations and undertakings can host Principal Investigators and their teams.
In a Synergy grant up to four Host Institutions could engage a Principal Investigator. Where they bring scientific added value to the project, additional team members may also be hosted by additional legal entities which will be eligible for funding, and which may be legal entities established anywhere, including outside the European Union or Associated Countries, or international organisations. Legal entities established outside the European Union or Associated Countries shall be eligible for funding provided that their participation is deemed essential for carrying out the action.
Restrictions on submission of proposals: The restrictions for submission are related to the outcome of the evaluation in previous calls and are designed to allow unsuccessful Principal Investigators the time necessary to develop a stronger proposal. For further details please consult page 19-20 of the ERC Work Programme 2018 or the Frequently Asked Questions.
Proposal page limits and layout: A complete proposal is composed of:
• Administrative Proposal Submission forms (including Ethics Review Table): available in section 5 of the topic conditions and in the submission tool below. To access the submission tool, you need to register to the Participant Portal first.
For Starting – Consolidator – Advanced – Synergy calls:
• The Research Proposal (Parts B1 and B2), also available in the submission tool, should be uploaded and submitted via the submission tool as PDF files.
For Proof of Concept call: • •The Proposal (Part B) and any supporting documentation should be uploaded and submitted via Participant Portal Submission System as PDF files.
• Host Institution Binding Statement of Support (available on this page below and as a word-template in PPSS). Only the host institution of the Corresponding Principal Investigator must confirm its association with and its support to the project and the Corresponding Principal Investigator, listing the other participating Principal Investigators.
• Ethics review self-assessment (if applicable) and supporting documentation.
For Starting – Consolidator – Advanced – Synergy calls:
Proposal Part B1
Extended Synopsis: max. 5 pages (please note that references do not count towards the page limits)
Curriculum Vitae: max. 2 pages for each Principal Investigator
Funding ID: no page limits
Track Record: max. 2 pages for each Principal Investigator
Proposal Part B2
Scientific Proposal: max. 15 pages (references do not count towards the page limit). Exceptionally for Synergy Grant applications the resources section that is included in the Scientific Proposal will not count towards the 15 page limit.
For Proof of Concept call:
Proposal Part B:
Idea and justification on innovation potential: max. 2 pages
Expected impact of the proposed innovation: 2 pages
Proof of concept plan: 2 pages
Budget table and justification: 1 page (+ Budget Table)
Evaluation
The conditions specific to ERC are described in the ERC Work Programme 2018 under the heading 'Evaluation procedure and criteria' and in the ERC Rules for Submission and Evaluation. An overview is provided below:
Evaluation procedure
For the Starting, Consolidator and Advanced grant calls a single submission of the full proposal will be followed by a two-step evaluation. The evaluation will be conducted by means of a structure of high level peer review panels as listed in Annex 1 of the ERC Work Programme 2018. The panels may be assisted by independent experts working remotely.
For the Synergy calls, a single submission of the full proposal will be followed by a three-step evaluation, including interviews. The evaluation will be conducted by means of a structure of dedicated panels. The panels may be assisted by independent experts working remotely.
Applicant Principal Investigators can request during the electronic proposal submission that up to four specific persons should not act as an evaluator in the evaluation of their proposal.
At step 1, the extended synopsis of the scientific proposal and the Principal Investigators’ track records and CVs will be assessed (and not the full scientific proposal).
&nb
Garantías:
No existen condiciones financieras para el beneficiario.
Información adicional de la convocatoria
Efecto incentivador:
Esta ayuda tiene efecto incentivador, por lo que el proyecto no puede haberse iniciado antes de la presentación de la solicitud de ayuda.
+ info.
Respuesta Organismo:
Se calcula que aproximadamente, la respuesta del organismo una vez tramitada la ayuda es de:
Meses de respuesta:
Muy Competitiva:
No conocemos el presupuesto total de la línea
Minimis:
Esta línea de financiación NO considera una “ayuda de minimis”.
Puedes consultar la normativa
aquí.
Otras ventajas
Sello PYME:
Tramitar esta ayuda con éxito permite conseguir el sello de calidad de “sello pyme innovadora”. Que permite ciertas ventajas fiscales.
H2020-EE-2016-2017
Models and tools for heating and cooling mapping and planning
Sin info.
SMP-COSME-2024-SEE-02
Greening SMEs in the proximity and social economy ecosystem through transnational co-operation
Cerrada
hace 6 meses
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
SMP-COSME-2022-SEE-01
Sustainable growth and building resilience in tourism – empowering SMEs to carry out the twin transition
Cerrada
hace 6 meses
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
SMP-COSME-2024-SEE-02
Greening SMEs in the proximity and social economy ecosystem through transnational co-operation
en consorcio:
Cerrada
hace 6 meses
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
SMP-COSME-2024-SEE-02
Greening SMEs in the proximity and social economy ecosystem through transnational co-operation
en consorcio:
Cerrada
hace 8 meses
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
SMP-COSME-2023-EENEE-01
Enterprise Europe Network Energy Efficiency Action
en consorcio:
Cerrada
hace 9 meses
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
Ayudas Similares
CDTI CID
| Abierta
| Abierta
Programa Tecnológico Espacial...
| Próximamente
| Próximamente
CDTI CIEN
| Abierta
| Abierta