HORIZON EUROPE
Europeo
Scope:Specific challenge:Innovative technologies for resource and energy efficiency require a consistent sustainability assessment across sectors and along the value chains. There is a need to increase the European knowledge base related to applied sustainability assessment tools, methodologies, indicators and to overcome the bottlenecks for cross-sectorial take-up and further development in the process industry.
Scope:The support action should involve a study across multiple sectors in the process industries considering all aspects of sustainability assessment along the whole product life cycles with regard to resource and energy efficiency. The outcome of the study should incorporate:
- A comparative overview of currently used methodologies, tools, indicators and practices in different sectors,
- A selection of the most appropriate solutions, based on their demonstrated robustness and their ability to provide simplified and easily communicated data,
- An overview of the related opportunities as well as the bottlenecks towards further development and cross-sectorial replication/transfer of these a...
ver más
Scope:Specific challenge:Innovative technologies for resource and energy efficiency require a consistent sustainability assessment across sectors and along the value chains. There is a need to increase the European knowledge base related to applied sustainability assessment tools, methodologies, indicators and to overcome the bottlenecks for cross-sectorial take-up and further development in the process industry.
Scope:The support action should involve a study across multiple sectors in the process industries considering all aspects of sustainability assessment along the whole product life cycles with regard to resource and energy efficiency. The outcome of the study should incorporate:
- A comparative overview of currently used methodologies, tools, indicators and practices in different sectors,
- A selection of the most appropriate solutions, based on their demonstrated robustness and their ability to provide simplified and easily communicated data,
- An overview of the related opportunities as well as the bottlenecks towards further development and cross-sectorial replication/transfer of these approaches,
- Definitions of the required steps to accelerate further uptake of resource efficiency indicators over the value chains, and
- Recommendations on the most suitable tools for management and decision making at research lab, plant, company, sector and multi-sectorial level.
The study should allow for the customisation and development of sector-specific tools, for example regarding boundaries of the system, and including technical aspects for each industry.
Strategies should be proposed to work with value chain partners, public authorities and final users, in particular to meet expectations in terms of relevant sustainability assessment (e.g. standards, labelling), and create a broad range of options to raise awareness levels and understanding of sustainability. The study should produce recommendations as input for further research and development projects in the field of sustainability assessment.
Collaboration with standardisation bodies should be addressed.
The methodology should also address the needs of companies operating in data -lean environments.
The Commission considers that proposals requesting a contribution from the EU between EUR 250 000 and 500 000 would allow this specific challenge to be addressed appropriately. Nonetheless, this does not preclude submission and selection of proposals requesting other amounts.
Expected impact:
Identification of best practices over different sectors for environmental, social and economic sustainability indicators to facilitate cross-sectorial deployment.
Identification of the research needs in this area to achieve a set of environmental, social and economic sustainability indicators suitable for the process industry.
Identification across the different sectors of the process industry of a set of tools for management and decision making at research lab, plant, company, sector and multi-sectorial level of the process industry.
Type of action: Coordination and Support Actions
Cross-cutting Priorities:Contractual Public-Private Partnerships (cPPPs)SPIRE
ver menos
Características del consorcio
:
La ayuda es de ámbito europeo, puede aplicar a esta linea cualquier empresa que forme parte de la Comunidad Europea.
Características del Proyecto
Los costes de personal subvencionables cubren las horas de trabajo efectivo de las personas directamente dedicadas a la ejecución de la acción. Los propietarios de pequeñas y medianas empresas que no perciban salario y otras personas físicas que no perciban salario podrán imputar los costes de personal sobre la base de una escala de costes unitarios
Los otros costes directos se dividen en los siguientes apartados: Viajes, amortizaciones, equipamiento y otros bienes y servicios. Se financia la amortización de equipos, permitiendo incluir la amortización de equipos adquiridos antes del proyecto si se registra durante su ejecución. En el apartado de otros bienes y servicios se incluyen los diferentes bienes y servicios comprados por los beneficiarios a proveedores externos para poder llevar a cabo sus tareas
La subcontratación en ayudas europeas no debe tratarse del core de actividades de I+D del proyecto. El contratista debe ser seleccionado por el beneficiario de acuerdo con el principio de mejor relación calidad-precio bajo las condiciones de transparencia e igualdad (en ningún caso consistirá en solicitar menos de 3 ofertas). En el caso de entidades públicas, para la subcontratación se deberán de seguir las leyes que rijan en el país al que pertenezca el contratante
Características de la financiación
1. List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
2. Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
3. EVALUATION
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme, with the following exceptions:
The threshold for the criteria Excellence and Impact will be 4. The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the three individual scores, will be 12.
In case of equal overall scores in the ranked list, the priority order of proposals will be established in accordance with part H of the General Annexes, except that proposals will be ranked on the basis of individual scores for the Impact criterion before the Excellence criterion.
3.2 Guide to the submission and evaluation process
4. Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
5. Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of one-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the final date for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 3 months from the date of informing successful... Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
1. List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
2. Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
3. EVALUATION
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme, with the following exceptions:
The threshold for the criteria Excellence and Impact will be 4. The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the three individual scores, will be 12.
In case of equal overall scores in the ranked list, the priority order of proposals will be established in accordance with part H of the General Annexes, except that proposals will be ranked on the basis of individual scores for the Impact criterion before the Excellence criterion.
3.2 Guide to the submission and evaluation process
4. Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
5. Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of one-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the final date for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 3 months from the date of informing successful applicants.
6. Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
Coordination and Support Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template (administrative forms and structure of technical annex)
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Model Grant Agreement
7. Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – where a topic description foresees financial support to Third Parties, these provisions apply.
8. Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Información adicional de la convocatoria
Otras ventajas
Ayudas Similares
| Abierta
| Próximamente
| Abierta