HORIZON EUROPE
Europeo
Scope:Specific challenge: Regulation of the nanomaterials market evolves parallel to technology development and societal requirements. The running project NANOREG addresses regulatory research for the quantification of hazard and exposure, a necessary step in regulatory risk assessment. The commercial viability of nanomaterial development in the EU is conditional on new nanomaterials meeting current and future regulatory requirements and should be based on cutting-edge technology with regard to the next steps of risk management and risk mitigation. Demonstration of integration of such technology into the design of new nanomaterials and products and their applications is a major challenge and the main objective of this joint action.
Scope:
(1) To develop and demonstrate Safe-by-Design regulatory approaches for nanomaterial development.
(2) To validate the tools and methodology, as well as their background data-sets, that will lead to the manufacture of novel, inherently safe nanomaterials.
(3) To address barriers for the application of Safe-by-Design as standard industry practice.
The project should seek to estab...
ver más
Scope:Specific challenge: Regulation of the nanomaterials market evolves parallel to technology development and societal requirements. The running project NANOREG addresses regulatory research for the quantification of hazard and exposure, a necessary step in regulatory risk assessment. The commercial viability of nanomaterial development in the EU is conditional on new nanomaterials meeting current and future regulatory requirements and should be based on cutting-edge technology with regard to the next steps of risk management and risk mitigation. Demonstration of integration of such technology into the design of new nanomaterials and products and their applications is a major challenge and the main objective of this joint action.
Scope:
(1) To develop and demonstrate Safe-by-Design regulatory approaches for nanomaterial development.
(2) To validate the tools and methodology, as well as their background data-sets, that will lead to the manufacture of novel, inherently safe nanomaterials.
(3) To address barriers for the application of Safe-by-Design as standard industry practice.
The project should seek to establish principles for grouping strategies for nanomaterials according to their assumed modes of toxicological action for regulatory purposes. Out of each group, a few representative materials should be selected and a toxicological profile shall be assessed. The scope may include novel materials, coated materials and self-assembled materials, nanomaterials with different surface functionalisation, and third generation particles. The project should take into account future dossier requirements under REACH, or other related EU legislation, to limit the required additional information, especially animal testing, to the essential minimum. Active participation of industrial partners is strongly encouraged to establish strong industry-authorities collaboration and the partners should conclude a results communication policy before the start of the project. This collaboration should be complemented by solid mechanisms networking state and private laboratories in nanotechnology toxicity testing and exposure control.
Activities expected to focus on Technology Readiness Level 5.
The Commission considers that, in addition to requested EU contribution between EUR 6 and 10 million, proposals should gather sufficient resources from EU Member States and Associated Countries to allow this specific challenge to be addressed appropriately. Nonetheless, this does not preclude submission and selection of proposals requesting other amounts. No more than one proposal will be funded.
Expected impact: The project is expected to:
Strengthen seamless collaboration among authorities of the EU Member States and Associated Countries with regard to the knowledge required for appropriate risk assessment and management in this field given the fast development of the market;
Bring together the activities of national authorities responsible for consumer and worker protection, public health, and the environment including chemical safety and all other relevant authorities covering the whole value;
Coordinate regulatory oriented activities of, or cooperate with, other on-going projects on toxicity testing, on decision making for material characterisation and testing protocols, and for data management; and
Integrate its work with OECD-WPMN, CEN[1] and ISO, and other European funded projects in the nanosafety cluster.
Type of action: Research and Innovation Action
[1] See Mandate M/461 addressed by the European Commission to CEN/CENELEC and ETSI. http://www.cen.eu/cen/Sectors/Sectors/Nanotechnologies/Documents/M461.pdf
Cross-cutting Priorities:International cooperation
ver menos
Características del consorcio
:
La ayuda es de ámbito europeo, puede aplicar a esta linea cualquier empresa que forme parte de la Comunidad Europea.
Características del Proyecto
Los costes de personal subvencionables cubren las horas de trabajo efectivo de las personas directamente dedicadas a la ejecución de la acción. Los propietarios de pequeñas y medianas empresas que no perciban salario y otras personas físicas que no perciban salario podrán imputar los costes de personal sobre la base de una escala de costes unitarios
Los otros costes directos se dividen en los siguientes apartados: Viajes, amortizaciones, equipamiento y otros bienes y servicios. Se financia la amortización de equipos, permitiendo incluir la amortización de equipos adquiridos antes del proyecto si se registra durante su ejecución. En el apartado de otros bienes y servicios se incluyen los diferentes bienes y servicios comprados por los beneficiarios a proveedores externos para poder llevar a cabo sus tareas
La subcontratación en ayudas europeas no debe tratarse del core de actividades de I+D del proyecto. El contratista debe ser seleccionado por el beneficiario de acuerdo con el principio de mejor relación calidad-precio bajo las condiciones de transparencia e igualdad (en ningún caso consistirá en solicitar menos de 3 ofertas). En el caso de entidades públicas, para la subcontratación se deberán de seguir las leyes que rijan en el país al que pertenezca el contratante
Características de la financiación
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme, with the following exceptions:
For single-stage and second-stage evaluations, the threshold for the criteria Excellence and Impact will be 4. The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the three individual scores, will be 12.
In case of equal overall scores in the ranked list, the priority order of proposals will be established in accordance with part H of the General Annexes, except that proposals will be ranked on the basis of individual scores for the Impact criterion before the Excellence criterion.
3.2 Guide to the submission and evaluation process
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the final date for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: max... Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme, with the following exceptions:
For single-stage and second-stage evaluations, the threshold for the criteria Excellence and Impact will be 4. The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the three individual scores, will be 12.
In case of equal overall scores in the ranked list, the priority order of proposals will be established in accordance with part H of the General Annexes, except that proposals will be ranked on the basis of individual scores for the Impact criterion before the Excellence criterion.
3.2 Guide to the submission and evaluation process
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the final date for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 3 months from the date of informing successful applicants.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
Research and Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – where a topic description foresees financial support to Third Parties, these provisions apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Información adicional de la convocatoria
Otras ventajas
Ayudas Similares
| Abierta
| Próximamente
| Abierta