HORIZON EUROPE
Europeo
Scope:Specific challenge: The ambition is to improve the way scientific knowledge can help inform and evaluate policy and societal responses to global challenges like climate change, global financial crises, global pandemics, and growth of cities – urbanisation and migration patterns. These challenges entangle actions across different sectors of policy and society and must be addressed by radically novel ideas and thinking for producing, delivering, and embedding scientific evidence into the policy and societal processes.
GSS will put to full use the abundance of data on social, economic, financial, technological, and ecological systems available today. GSS emphasises systems thinking and the need to integrate/link data, models, and policies across all policy sectors with all societal actors. GSS will build on results from, among others, Complex Systems Science, Network Science, Mathematics of Big Data, the life sciences, social sciences and humanities, behavioural sciences, statistics, econophysics, etc.
Scope: Proposals must address all of the below elements, necessary to successfully embed scientific evidence in the policy processes for tackling global...
ver más
Scope:Specific challenge: The ambition is to improve the way scientific knowledge can help inform and evaluate policy and societal responses to global challenges like climate change, global financial crises, global pandemics, and growth of cities – urbanisation and migration patterns. These challenges entangle actions across different sectors of policy and society and must be addressed by radically novel ideas and thinking for producing, delivering, and embedding scientific evidence into the policy and societal processes.
GSS will put to full use the abundance of data on social, economic, financial, technological, and ecological systems available today. GSS emphasises systems thinking and the need to integrate/link data, models, and policies across all policy sectors with all societal actors. GSS will build on results from, among others, Complex Systems Science, Network Science, Mathematics of Big Data, the life sciences, social sciences and humanities, behavioural sciences, statistics, econophysics, etc.
Scope: Proposals must address all of the below elements, necessary to successfully embed scientific evidence in the policy processes for tackling global challenges:
• Research grounded in theoretical foundations of, among others, systemic risk, decision making under uncertainty or conflicting evidence, mathematics and computer science for Big Data (including their characteristics), algorithmic game theory, cascading/escalating effects in networks, integration and visualisation of Big Data…
• Contributions to solving real world problems in one selected problem area - for instance tackling systemic risk in finance/economics, managing growth of cities and migration, or global pandemics – and in particular to tackle cross-cutting policy dependencies and interactions affecting the area of choice.
• Novel ideas and technologies to generate and better communicate the scientific evidence-base: advanced simulation of highly interconnected systems; mathematical and tools for analysing (often unstructured) Big Data; integration of the whole spectrum of structure and unstructured data; methods to deal with conflicting data and modeling results; novel data visualisation tools.
• Society/human-centred technologies, for instance, new approaches to allow citizens to actively participate in the policy process, to collectively gather and integrate data, analyse evidence, and novel methods to better judge and use scientific evidence: methods, e.g. games, gamification, and narratives to clearly and consistently convey data and modeling results and thereby to stimulate societal responses.
The Commission considers that proposals requesting a contribution from the EU of between EUR 2 and 3 million would allow this specific challenge to be addressed appropriately. Nonetheless, this does not preclude submission and selection of proposals requesting other amounts.
Expected impact:
• Level to which research proposed is rooted in policy needs, promotes system thinking, and is delivering consistent messages from conflicting data and model results.
• Level of use/uptake of GSS tools and methods in the policy and societal processes, including in EC policies.
• Capacity of GSS to help integrate societal responses across policy domains and cross-cutting authorities by development of a system-wide integrated evidence base of data and models.
Type of action: Research and Innovation Actions
ver menos
Características del consorcio
:
La ayuda es de ámbito europeo, puede aplicar a esta linea cualquier empresa que forme parte de la Comunidad Europea.
Características del Proyecto
Los costes de personal subvencionables cubren las horas de trabajo efectivo de las personas directamente dedicadas a la ejecución de la acción. Los propietarios de pequeñas y medianas empresas que no perciban salario y otras personas físicas que no perciban salario podrán imputar los costes de personal sobre la base de una escala de costes unitarios
Los otros costes directos se dividen en los siguientes apartados: Viajes, amortizaciones, equipamiento y otros bienes y servicios. Se financia la amortización de equipos, permitiendo incluir la amortización de equipos adquiridos antes del proyecto si se registra durante su ejecución. En el apartado de otros bienes y servicios se incluyen los diferentes bienes y servicios comprados por los beneficiarios a proveedores externos para poder llevar a cabo sus tareas
La subcontratación en ayudas europeas no debe tratarse del core de actividades de I+D del proyecto. El contratista debe ser seleccionado por el beneficiario de acuerdo con el principio de mejor relación calidad-precio bajo las condiciones de transparencia e igualdad (en ningún caso consistirá en solicitar menos de 3 ofertas). En el caso de entidades públicas, para la subcontratación se deberán de seguir las leyes que rijan en el país al que pertenezca el contratante
Características de la financiación
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme, with the following additions:
Part B is strictly limited to 16 A4 pages and shall consist of:
- A single A4 title page with acronym, title and abstract of the proposal.
- Maximum 15 A4 pages consisting of an S&T section (section 1), an Impact section (section 2) and an Implementation section (section 3).
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: FET support interdisciplinary research positioned between research driven by science and research driven by societal challenges or by industrial competitiveness. FET research aims at accelerating the transition from upstream research to technology development. Due to this specific nature of FET research, FET applies specific evaluation criteria.
Thresholds and weights are set for each criterion, as indicated in the table below. A proposal failing to achieve any of these threshold scores will not be funded.
Subcriteria for evaluation criterion 1 "Excellence":
* Clarity of targeted breakthrough and its specific science and technology contributions tow... Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme, with the following additions:
Part B is strictly limited to 16 A4 pages and shall consist of:
- A single A4 title page with acronym, title and abstract of the proposal.
- Maximum 15 A4 pages consisting of an S&T section (section 1), an Impact section (section 2) and an Implementation section (section 3).
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: FET support interdisciplinary research positioned between research driven by science and research driven by societal challenges or by industrial competitiveness. FET research aims at accelerating the transition from upstream research to technology development. Due to this specific nature of FET research, FET applies specific evaluation criteria.
Thresholds and weights are set for each criterion, as indicated in the table below. A proposal failing to achieve any of these threshold scores will not be funded.
Subcriteria for evaluation criterion 1 "Excellence":
* Clarity of targeted breakthrough and its specific science and technology contributions towards a long-term vision.
* Novelty, level of ambition and foundational character.
* Range and added value from interdisciplinarity.
* Appropriatness of the research methods.
Threshold for this criterion: 4/5
Weight for this criterion: 60%
Subcriteria for evaluation criterion 2 "Impact":
* Importance of the new technological outcome with regards to its transformational impact on technology and/or society.
* Quality of measures for achieving impact on science, technology and/or society.
* Impact from empowerment of new and high potential actors towards future technological leadership.
Threshold for this criterion: 3.5/5
Weight for this criterion: 20%
Subcriteria for evaluation criterion 3 "Quality and efficiency of the implementation":
* Quality of the workplan and clarity of intermediate targets.
* Relevant expertise in the consortium.
* Appropriate allocation and justification of resources (person-months, equipment, budget).
Threshold for this criterion: 3/5
Weight for this criterion: 20%
Specific evaluation procedure:
At consensus stage, the consensus score for each evaluation criteria will be the median of the corresponding scores attributed by the individual evaluators and the consensus report will comprise a collation of the comments from individual reports, or extracts from them.
The procedure for setting a priority order for proposals with the same score is given in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
3.2 Guide to the submission and evaluation process
Proposal page limits and layout: See eligibility conditions above.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of the evaluation: maximum 5 months from the final date for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 3 months from the date of informing successful applicants.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
Research and Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
For this topic you must use the specific proposal template Part B of "FET Proactive / Research and Innovation Actions"
For this topic, in addition to the standard criteria, specific evaluation subcriteria (indicated above) apply. These are contained in the specific evaluation form of "FET Proactive / Research and Innovation Actions"
Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional information material for this topic
Overview presentation and more
Overview web page with additional background presentations
Información adicional de la convocatoria
Otras ventajas
Ayudas Similares
| Abierta
| Próximamente
| Abierta