HORIZON EUROPE
Cerrada
NFRP-10-2015
NFRP-10-2015:
Education and training (Bologna and Copenhagen processes)
Europeo
Scope:Specific challenge: One of the main goals of Euratom from its inception in developing research and training programmes is to maintain nuclear expertise by generating knowledge (research) and developing competences (training). A key concern of industry and policy makers (in particular, regulators) world-wide is that human resources could be at risk, especially because of high retirement expectations and low renewal rates in countries with a tradition of nuclear installations and a strong need for further specialised training in emerging nuclear energy countries. More specifically, within the EU, the nuclear education and training community is faced with the challenges of lifelong learning and cross border mobility. This action should be undertaken under the umbrella of the Technology Platforms and other authoritative expert bodies concerned.
Sólo fondo perdido
0 €
Europeo
Esta convocatoria está cerrada
Esta línea ya está cerrada por lo que no puedes aplicar. Cerró el pasado día 17-09-2014.
Se espera una próxima convocatoria para esta ayuda, aún no está clara la fecha exacta de inicio de convocatoria.
Por suerte, hemos conseguido la lista de proyectos financiados!
Presentación:
Consorcio
Consorcio:
Esta ayuda está diseñada para aplicar a ella en formato consorcio.
Número mínimo de participantes.
Esta ayuda financia
Proyectos:
Objetivo del proyecto:
Scope:Specific challenge: One of the main goals of Euratom from its inception in developing research and training programmes is to maintain nuclear expertise by generating knowledge (research) and developing competences (training). A key concern of industry and policy makers (in particular, regulators) world-wide is that human resources could be at risk, especially because of high retirement expectations and low renewal rates in countries with a tradition of nuclear installations and a strong need for further specialised training in emerging nuclear energy countries. More specifically, within the EU, the nuclear education and training community is faced with the challenges of lifelong learning and cross border mobility. This action should be undertaken under the umbrella of the Technology Platforms and other authoritative expert bodies concerned.
Scope: Special attention is to be devoted to the further implementation, in the nuclear and relevant medical and industrial sectors, of the EU policies stemming from the Bologna and Copenhagen processes[1]. Education and training organisations (notably at university or equivalent level) are invited to submit proposals in close...
ver más
Scope:Specific challenge: One of the main goals of Euratom from its inception in developing research and training programmes is to maintain nuclear expertise by generating knowledge (research) and developing competences (training). A key concern of industry and policy makers (in particular, regulators) world-wide is that human resources could be at risk, especially because of high retirement expectations and low renewal rates in countries with a tradition of nuclear installations and a strong need for further specialised training in emerging nuclear energy countries. More specifically, within the EU, the nuclear education and training community is faced with the challenges of lifelong learning and cross border mobility. This action should be undertaken under the umbrella of the Technology Platforms and other authoritative expert bodies concerned.
Scope: Special attention is to be devoted to the further implementation, in the nuclear and relevant medical and industrial sectors, of the EU policies stemming from the Bologna and Copenhagen processes[1]. Education and training organisations (notably at university or equivalent level) are invited to submit proposals in close collaboration with the “end–users”, i.e. industry, research and regulatory organisations. A special effort should be devoted to the development of European Masters and summer schools for the continuous professional development of researchers and other private/public actors. The implementation of the action will need coordination involving research and educational institutions, practitioners in the respective area, regulators, equipment manufacturers and stakeholders from different Member States. Particular attention shall be paid to gender balance in the composition of project teams.
Expected impact: This activity will accelerate and optimise the development of competences in the nuclear area with a special focus on nuclear safety culture and radioactive waste management. It will contribute to the creation and transfer not only of knowledge but also of skills and competences in a well-focused and practical manner. In the long term, it will contribute to improving the safety and radiation protection culture and hence, the safety of nuclear installations in the EU.
Type of action: Coordination and Support Actions.
Additional information: The Commission considers that proposals requesting a contribution from the Euratom of between EUR 1 and 3 million would allow this specific challenge to be addressed appropriately. Nonetheless, this does not preclude submission and selection of proposals requesting other amounts.
[1] Bologna process (1999) for academic education (European Credit Transfer and accumulation System/ ECTS), providing a robust basis for Euromaster programmes and doctoral schools, the Copenhagen process (2002) for Vocational Education and Training (European Credit System for VET/ECVET), fostering the synergy between the worlds of education / training and of work / industry
ver menos
Características del consorcio
Ámbito Europeo :
La ayuda es de ámbito europeo, puede aplicar a esta linea cualquier empresa que forme parte de la Comunidad Europea.
:
La ayuda es de ámbito europeo, puede aplicar a esta linea cualquier empresa que forme parte de la Comunidad Europea.
Tipo y tamaño de organizaciones:
El diseño de consorcio necesario para la tramitación de esta ayuda necesita de:
Características del Proyecto
Requisitos de diseño:
Duración:
Requisitos técnicos: Scope:Specific challenge: One of the main goals of Euratom from its inception in developing research and training programmes is to maintain nuclear expertise by generating knowledge (research) and developing competences (training). A key concern of industry and policy makers (in particular, regulators) world-wide is that human resources could be at risk, especially because of high retirement expectations and low renewal rates in countries with a tradition of nuclear installations and a strong need for further specialised training in emerging nuclear energy countries. More specifically, within the EU, the nuclear education and training community is faced with the challenges of lifelong learning and cross border mobility. This action should be undertaken under the umbrella of the Technology Platforms and other authoritative expert bodies concerned.
Scope:Specific challenge: One of the main goals of Euratom from its inception in developing research and training programmes is to maintain nuclear expertise by generating knowledge (research) and developing competences (training). A key concern of industry and policy makers (in particular, regulators) world-wide is that human resources could be at risk, especially because of high retirement expectations and low renewal rates in countries with a tradition of nuclear installations and a strong need for further specialised training in emerging nuclear energy countries. More specifically, within the EU, the nuclear education and training community is faced with the challenges of lifelong learning and cross border mobility. This action should be undertaken under the umbrella of the Technology Platforms and other authoritative expert bodies concerned.
¿Quieres ejemplos? Puedes consultar aquí los últimos proyectos conocidos financiados por esta línea, sus tecnologías, sus presupuestos y sus compañías.
Capítulos financiables:
Los capítulos de gastos financiables para esta línea son:
Personnel costs.
Los costes de personal subvencionables cubren las horas de trabajo efectivo de las personas directamente dedicadas a la ejecución de la acción. Los propietarios de pequeñas y medianas empresas que no perciban salario y otras personas físicas que no perciban salario podrán imputar los costes de personal sobre la base de una escala de costes unitarios
Los costes de personal subvencionables cubren las horas de trabajo efectivo de las personas directamente dedicadas a la ejecución de la acción. Los propietarios de pequeñas y medianas empresas que no perciban salario y otras personas físicas que no perciban salario podrán imputar los costes de personal sobre la base de una escala de costes unitarios
Purchase costs.
Los otros costes directos se dividen en los siguientes apartados: Viajes, amortizaciones, equipamiento y otros bienes y servicios. Se financia la amortización de equipos, permitiendo incluir la amortización de equipos adquiridos antes del proyecto si se registra durante su ejecución. En el apartado de otros bienes y servicios se incluyen los diferentes bienes y servicios comprados por los beneficiarios a proveedores externos para poder llevar a cabo sus tareas
Los otros costes directos se dividen en los siguientes apartados: Viajes, amortizaciones, equipamiento y otros bienes y servicios. Se financia la amortización de equipos, permitiendo incluir la amortización de equipos adquiridos antes del proyecto si se registra durante su ejecución. En el apartado de otros bienes y servicios se incluyen los diferentes bienes y servicios comprados por los beneficiarios a proveedores externos para poder llevar a cabo sus tareas
Subcontracting costs.
La subcontratación en ayudas europeas no debe tratarse del core de actividades de I+D del proyecto. El contratista debe ser seleccionado por el beneficiario de acuerdo con el principio de mejor relación calidad-precio bajo las condiciones de transparencia e igualdad (en ningún caso consistirá en solicitar menos de 3 ofertas). En el caso de entidades públicas, para la subcontratación se deberán de seguir las leyes que rijan en el país al que pertenezca el contratante
La subcontratación en ayudas europeas no debe tratarse del core de actividades de I+D del proyecto. El contratista debe ser seleccionado por el beneficiario de acuerdo con el principio de mejor relación calidad-precio bajo las condiciones de transparencia e igualdad (en ningún caso consistirá en solicitar menos de 3 ofertas). En el caso de entidades públicas, para la subcontratación se deberán de seguir las leyes que rijan en el país al que pertenezca el contratante
Amortizaciones.
Activos.
Otros Gastos.
Madurez tecnológica:
La tramitación de esta ayuda requiere de un nivel tecnológico mínimo en el proyecto de TRL 5:.
Los elementos básicos de la innovación son integrados de manera que la configuración final es similar a su aplicación final, es decir que está listo para ser usado en la simulación de un entorno real. Se mejoran los modelos tanto técnicos como económicos del diseño inicial, se ha identificado adicionalmente aspectos de seguridad, limitaciones ambiéntales y/o regulatorios entre otros. + info.
Características de la financiación
Intensidad de la ayuda:
Sólo fondo perdido
+ info
Fondo perdido:
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects (follow the links to China, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Taiwan).
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
The conditions specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) are described in the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
The conditions specific to European Research Council (ERC) grants are described in the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the heading 'Eligibility criteria' and in the ERC Rules for Submission and Evaluation.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
The award c... Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects (follow the links to China, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Taiwan).
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
The conditions specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) are described in the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
The conditions specific to European Research Council (ERC) grants are described in the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the heading 'Eligibility criteria' and in the ERC Rules for Submission and Evaluation.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
The award criteria and evaluation procedure specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) is described in the MSCA section of the General Work Programme.
The conditions specific to the European Research Council (ERC) are described in the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the heading 'Evaluation procedure and criteria'.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
[ERC]:
Please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the heading 'Indicative summary of main calls from the 2016 budget'.
[SME instrument, ToA SME-1]:
Information on the outcome of phase 1 of the SME Instrument: maximum 2 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 3 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[SME instrument, ToA SME-2]:
Information on the outcome of phase 2 of the SME Instrument: maximum 4 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 6 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[FET multiple cut-off]:
Information on the outcome of evaluation: maximum 5 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[FTI multiple cut-off]:
Information on the outcome: maximum 3 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 6 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
Research and Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Coordination and Support Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
SME instrument (phase 1):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA SME Ph1 - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA SME Ph1 – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
SME instrument (phase 2):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA SME Ph2 - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA SME Ph2 – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
ERANET Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA ERANET Cofund - Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Grant Agreement
Specific requirements for innovation procurement supported by Horizon 2020 grants (PCP, PPI)
Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions (PPI) Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Grant Agreement
Specific requirements for innovation procurement supported by Horizon 2020 grants (PCP, PP)
European Joint Programme (EJP) Cofund
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA EJP Cofund – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Framework Partnership Agreement:
Specific provisions and funding rates (FPA & SGA)
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA Framework Partnership - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Framework Partnership - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Specific – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Specific – Mono-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
[ERC types of action]:
ERC Starting Grant:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Starting Grant profile'.
ERC standard proposal template
ERC standard evaluation form for STG/COG
H2020 ERC MGA – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
ERC Consolidator Grant:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Consolidator Grant profile'.
ERC standard proposal template
ERC standard evaluation form for STG/COG
H2020 ERC MGA – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
ERC Advanced Grant:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Advanced Grant profile'.
ERC standard proposal template
ERC standard evaluation form for ADG
H2020 ERC MGA – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
ERC Proof of Concept Grant:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Proof of Concept Grant profile'.
ERC proposal template for POC
ERC standard evaluation form for POC
H2020 ERC MGA PoC - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA PoC - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
[MSC types of action]:
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA IF)
European Fellowships:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC IF – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA IF)
Global Fellowships:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC IF – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Training Networks:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Industrial Doctorates:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Anotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Joint Doctorates:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN – Multi--Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE):
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC RISE – Multi--Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Co-funding of regional, national and international programmes (COFUND)
Doctoral programmes:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC COFUND - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Co-funding of regional, national and international programmes (COFUND)
Fellowship programmes:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC COFUND - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – where a topic description foresees financial support to Third Parties, these provisions apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
[ERC]
Open access: the ERC supports the principle of open access to the published output of research, including in particular peer-reviewed articles and monographs, as a fundamental part of its mission. It also supports the basic principle of open access to research data and data related products such as computer code. The ERC considers that providing free online access to all these materials can be the most effective way of ensuring that the fruits of the research it funds can be accessed, read and used as the basis for further research. Under Horizon 2020, beneficiaries of ERC grants must ensure open access to all peer-reviewed scientific publications relating to its results. The detailed requirements on open access to publications are contained in the Horizon 2020 ERC Model Grant Agreement.
[Prizes – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part 8 of the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink of the Rules for Contests. Please send all the contest documents to RTD J.3 for publication and they will send you the hyperlinks to be added.
Eligibility and exclusion criteria: described in part 8 of the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to the application template.
Evaluation and award criteria and procedure: described in part 3 of the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and award of prizes:
Please add the timelines.
Application templates and evaluation forms for prizes under this topic:
Application template for inducement prizes
Evaluation form for inducement prizes
Additional provisions: described in the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink.
The general rules for Prizes are described in part F of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
[BBI JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme, with the exceptions described in part 3.5.7 of the BBI JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process and the BBI JU Calls - Guide for applicants (RIA-DEMO-CSA).
BBI JU Calls - Guide for applicants (flagship projects)
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
BBI Research and Innovation Action (BBI-RIA)
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the Annex of the BBI JU Annual Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
BBI JU Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
BBI Innovation Action Demonstration (BBI-IA-DEMO)
and BBI Innovation Action Flagship (BBI-IA-FLAG)
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the Annex of the BBI JU Annual Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form (FLAG)
Standard evaluation form (DEMO)
BBI JU Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
BBI Coordination and Support Action (BBI-CSA)
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the Annex of the BBI JU Annual Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
BBI JU Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Technology readiness levels (TRL) apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents
BBI JU Call fiche
BBI JU Work Plan
BBI JU Scientific Innovation and Research Agenda (SIRA)
Horizon 2020 Rules for participation
BBI JU Derogation to H2020 Rules for Participation
BBI JU Regulation of establishment
[Clean Sky calls – 2016 topics conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in Part A of the General Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B & C of the general Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part F of the General Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process:
described in the Clean Sky 2 Rules for submission, evaluation, selection, award and review procedures of calls for Core Partners.
described in the Clean Sky 2 Rules for submission, evaluation, selection, award and review procedures of calls for proposals.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement: maximum 8 months from the date of closure of the call.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
The proposal templates will be available in the submission system. The templates below serve only as examples.
Proposal template CS2 - RIA
Proposal template CS2 - IA
Proposal template CS2 - CSA
H2020 Clean Sky 2 JU MGA for Members
H2020 Clean Sky 2 JU MGA for Partners - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Clean Sky 2 JU MGA for Partners - Mono-Beneficiary
Additional provisions:
Clean Sky 2 Budget Flexibility:
see Part G of the General Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 JU Work Plan.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
Clean Sky 2 Joint Technical Programme
Clean Sky 2 JU Financial Rules
Clean Sky 2 JU – Regulation of establishment
Clean Sky 2 Summary list of topics in the call 2014
Clean Sky 2 Joint Technical Programme
Clean Sky 2 JU Financial Rules
Clean Sky 2 JU – Regulation of establishment
[ECSEL JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the Annexes of the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold:
Part H of the Annexes of the ECSEL JU Work Plan describes the details of the evaluation and selection process. The evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold are also described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: described in the ECSEL JU Calls – Guide for applicants.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
The proposal templates to be filled in will be available in the submission system. The templates below serve only as examples.
ECSEL Research and Innovation Action (ECSEL-RIA):
Specific provisions and funding rates described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
ECSEL Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
ECSEL Innovation Action (ECSEL-IA):
Specific provisions and funding rates described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
ECSEL Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information - described in Annex D of the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – the definitions described in Annex C of the ECSEL JU Work Plan apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – the provisions described in Annex E of the ECSEL JU Work Plan apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
ECSEL JU Call fiche
ECSEL JU Multi Annual Strategic Plan
ECSEL JU – Regulation of establishment
[FCH JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in in part B and C of the Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in part E of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: described in the FCH2 Guide for applicants on submission and evaluation.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
FCH2 Research and Innovation Action (FCH2-RIA):
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
FCH2 Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
FCH2 Innovation Action (FCH2-IA):
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
FCH2 Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
FCH JU budget flexibility is described in the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Technology readiness levels (TRL): described in part E of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
FCH2 JU Work Plan
FCH2 JU Multi Annual Work Plan
FCH2 JU – Regulation of establishment
[IMI JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in article 10(2) of Regulation N° 1290/2013 of 11 December 2013 laying down the rules for participation and dissemination in Horizon 2020 and in article 1 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) N° 622/2014 of 14 February 2014.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the IMI2 Manual for evaluation, submission and grant award. See also the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) N° 622/2014 of 14 February 2014.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
Submission and evaluation process, including evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold are described in the IMI2 Manual for submission, evaluation and grant award.
See also the proposal templates for your specific action in section 6, below.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of one-stage evaluation: maximum 2 months from the final date for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 1 month from the date of informing successful applicants.
Notification of outcomes of stage 1 evaluations: Maximum 5 months from deadline for submitting proposals.
Notification of outcomes of stage 2 evaluations: Maximum 2 months from deadline for submitting full proposals.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 2 months from the date of informing successful applicants.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
IMI2 Research and Innovation Action (IMI2-RIA) and (IMI2-IA):
Summary of the most relevant provisions for participating in IMI2 actions
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
IMI2 Model Grant Agreement
MI2 Coordination and Support Action (IMI2-CSA):
Summary of the most relevant provisions for participating in IMI2 actions
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
IMI2 Model Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
IMI2 Call Fiche
IMI2 Work Plan
IMI JU derogation to H2020 Rules for Participation
[SESAR JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in Annex of the ad hoc financing decision.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the Annex of the ad hoc financing decision and part B of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the SJU proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in the Annex of the ad hoc financing decision and in the SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research: Call for Research Projects.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
For the applicable thresholds to this Exploratory Research Call for Proposals, please refer to point 3.1 above.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
Research and Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in ad hoc financing decision
SJU proposal template
SJU evaluation form
SJU Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) . Please also refer to the document SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research: Call for Research Projects.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions and proposals must refer to measures envisaged.
SJU additional documents
SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research: Call for Research Projects
SJU Annual Work Programme
ATM Master Plan
Second draft of the SESAR 2020 R&I Programme ed. 0.21 dated 07 July 2014
Project Execution Guidance for SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research
[Shift2Rail JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in the Shift2Rail JU Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the Shift2Rail JU Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in part F of the Shift2Rail JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process and the Shift2Rail Guide for Applicants.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in
Research and Innovation Action (S2R-RIA):
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
Shift2Rail Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – where a topic description foresees financial support to Third Parties, these provisions apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents
Shift2Rail JU Annual Work Programme
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects (follow the links to China, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Taiwan).
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
The conditions specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) are described in the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
The conditions specific to European Research Council (ERC) grants are described in the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the heading 'Eligibility criteria' and in the ERC Rules for Submission and Evaluation.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
The award c... Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects (follow the links to China, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Taiwan).
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
The conditions specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) are described in the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
The conditions specific to European Research Council (ERC) grants are described in the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the heading 'Eligibility criteria' and in the ERC Rules for Submission and Evaluation.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme [, with the following exceptions]:
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
The award criteria and evaluation procedure specific to Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) is described in the MSCA section of the General Work Programme.
The conditions specific to the European Research Council (ERC) are described in the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the heading 'Evaluation procedure and criteria'.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
[ERC]:
Please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the heading 'Indicative summary of main calls from the 2016 budget'.
[SME instrument, ToA SME-1]:
Information on the outcome of phase 1 of the SME Instrument: maximum 2 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 3 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[SME instrument, ToA SME-2]:
Information on the outcome of phase 2 of the SME Instrument: maximum 4 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 6 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[FET multiple cut-off]:
Information on the outcome of evaluation: maximum 5 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
[FTI multiple cut-off]:
Information on the outcome: maximum 3 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 6 months after the corresponding cut-off date.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
Research and Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Coordination and Support Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 General MGA -Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
SME instrument (phase 1):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA SME Ph1 - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA SME Ph1 – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
SME instrument (phase 2):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA SME Ph2 - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA SME Ph2 – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
ERANET Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA ERANET Cofund - Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Grant Agreement
Specific requirements for innovation procurement supported by Horizon 2020 grants (PCP, PPI)
Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions (PPI) Cofund:
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
Annotated Grant Agreement
Specific requirements for innovation procurement supported by Horizon 2020 grants (PCP, PP)
European Joint Programme (EJP) Cofund
Specific provisions and funding rates
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA EJP Cofund – Multi-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
Framework Partnership Agreement:
Specific provisions and funding rates (FPA & SGA)
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA Framework Partnership - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Framework Partnership - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Specific – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 MGA Specific – Mono-Beneficiary
Annotated Grant Agreement
[ERC types of action]:
ERC Starting Grant:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Starting Grant profile'.
ERC standard proposal template
ERC standard evaluation form for STG/COG
H2020 ERC MGA – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
ERC Consolidator Grant:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Consolidator Grant profile'.
ERC standard proposal template
ERC standard evaluation form for STG/COG
H2020 ERC MGA – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
ERC Advanced Grant:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Advanced Grant profile'.
ERC standard proposal template
ERC standard evaluation form for ADG
H2020 ERC MGA – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
ERC Proof of Concept Grant:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the ERC Work Programme 2016 under the headings 'Funding rates' and 'Proof of Concept Grant profile'.
ERC proposal template for POC
ERC standard evaluation form for POC
H2020 ERC MGA PoC - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 ERC MGA PoC - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
[MSC types of action]:
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA IF)
European Fellowships:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC IF – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (MSCA IF)
Global Fellowships:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC IF – Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Training Networks:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Industrial Doctorates:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Anotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN)
European Joint Doctorates:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC ITN – Multi--Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research and Innovation Staff Exchange (RISE):
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC RISE – Multi--Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Co-funding of regional, national and international programmes (COFUND)
Doctoral programmes:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC COFUND - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Co-funding of regional, national and international programmes (COFUND)
Fellowship programmes:
Specific provisions and funding rates: please refer to the MSCA part of the H2020 Work Programme.
MSCA standard proposal template
MSCA standard evaluation form
H2020 MGA MSC COFUND - Mono-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – where a topic description foresees financial support to Third Parties, these provisions apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
[ERC]
Open access: the ERC supports the principle of open access to the published output of research, including in particular peer-reviewed articles and monographs, as a fundamental part of its mission. It also supports the basic principle of open access to research data and data related products such as computer code. The ERC considers that providing free online access to all these materials can be the most effective way of ensuring that the fruits of the research it funds can be accessed, read and used as the basis for further research. Under Horizon 2020, beneficiaries of ERC grants must ensure open access to all peer-reviewed scientific publications relating to its results. The detailed requirements on open access to publications are contained in the Horizon 2020 ERC Model Grant Agreement.
[Prizes – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part 8 of the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink of the Rules for Contests. Please send all the contest documents to RTD J.3 for publication and they will send you the hyperlinks to be added.
Eligibility and exclusion criteria: described in part 8 of the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to the application template.
Evaluation and award criteria and procedure: described in part 3 of the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and award of prizes:
Please add the timelines.
Application templates and evaluation forms for prizes under this topic:
Application template for inducement prizes
Evaluation form for inducement prizes
Additional provisions: described in the Rules for Contests.
Please add the hyperlink.
The general rules for Prizes are described in part F of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
[BBI JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme, with the exceptions described in part 3.5.7 of the BBI JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process and the BBI JU Calls - Guide for applicants (RIA-DEMO-CSA).
BBI JU Calls - Guide for applicants (flagship projects)
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
BBI Research and Innovation Action (BBI-RIA)
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the Annex of the BBI JU Annual Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
BBI JU Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
BBI Innovation Action Demonstration (BBI-IA-DEMO)
and BBI Innovation Action Flagship (BBI-IA-FLAG)
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the Annex of the BBI JU Annual Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form (FLAG)
Standard evaluation form (DEMO)
BBI JU Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
BBI Coordination and Support Action (BBI-CSA)
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the Annex of the BBI JU Annual Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
BBI JU Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Technology readiness levels (TRL) apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents
BBI JU Call fiche
BBI JU Work Plan
BBI JU Scientific Innovation and Research Agenda (SIRA)
Horizon 2020 Rules for participation
BBI JU Derogation to H2020 Rules for Participation
BBI JU Regulation of establishment
[Clean Sky calls – 2016 topics conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in Part A of the General Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B & C of the general Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part F of the General Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process:
described in the Clean Sky 2 Rules for submission, evaluation, selection, award and review procedures of calls for Core Partners.
described in the Clean Sky 2 Rules for submission, evaluation, selection, award and review procedures of calls for proposals.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement: maximum 8 months from the date of closure of the call.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
The proposal templates will be available in the submission system. The templates below serve only as examples.
Proposal template CS2 - RIA
Proposal template CS2 - IA
Proposal template CS2 - CSA
H2020 Clean Sky 2 JU MGA for Members
H2020 Clean Sky 2 JU MGA for Partners - Multi-Beneficiary
H2020 Clean Sky 2 JU MGA for Partners - Mono-Beneficiary
Additional provisions:
Clean Sky 2 Budget Flexibility:
see Part G of the General Annexes of the Clean Sky 2 JU Work Plan.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
Clean Sky 2 Joint Technical Programme
Clean Sky 2 JU Financial Rules
Clean Sky 2 JU – Regulation of establishment
Clean Sky 2 Summary list of topics in the call 2014
Clean Sky 2 Joint Technical Programme
Clean Sky 2 JU Financial Rules
Clean Sky 2 JU – Regulation of establishment
[ECSEL JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the Annexes of the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold:
Part H of the Annexes of the ECSEL JU Work Plan describes the details of the evaluation and selection process. The evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold are also described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: described in the ECSEL JU Calls – Guide for applicants.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
The proposal templates to be filled in will be available in the submission system. The templates below serve only as examples.
ECSEL Research and Innovation Action (ECSEL-RIA):
Specific provisions and funding rates described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
ECSEL Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
ECSEL Innovation Action (ECSEL-IA):
Specific provisions and funding rates described in the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
ECSEL Model Grant Agreement – Multi-Beneficiary
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information - described in Annex D of the ECSEL JU Work Plan.
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – the definitions described in Annex C of the ECSEL JU Work Plan apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – the provisions described in Annex E of the ECSEL JU Work Plan apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
ECSEL JU Call fiche
ECSEL JU Multi Annual Strategic Plan
ECSEL JU – Regulation of establishment
[FCH JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in in part B and C of the Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in part E of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: described in the FCH2 Guide for applicants on submission and evaluation.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
FCH2 Research and Innovation Action (FCH2-RIA):
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
FCH2 Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
FCH2 Innovation Action (FCH2-IA):
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in part D of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
FCH2 Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
FCH JU budget flexibility is described in the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Technology readiness levels (TRL): described in part E of the General Annexes of the FCH2 JU Work Plan.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
FCH2 JU Work Plan
FCH2 JU Multi Annual Work Plan
FCH2 JU – Regulation of establishment
[IMI JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in article 10(2) of Regulation N° 1290/2013 of 11 December 2013 laying down the rules for participation and dissemination in Horizon 2020 and in article 1 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) N° 622/2014 of 14 February 2014.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the IMI2 Manual for evaluation, submission and grant award. See also the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) N° 622/2014 of 14 February 2014.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
Submission and evaluation process, including evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold are described in the IMI2 Manual for submission, evaluation and grant award.
See also the proposal templates for your specific action in section 6, below.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of one-stage evaluation: maximum 2 months from the final date for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 1 month from the date of informing successful applicants.
Notification of outcomes of stage 1 evaluations: Maximum 5 months from deadline for submitting proposals.
Notification of outcomes of stage 2 evaluations: Maximum 2 months from deadline for submitting full proposals.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 2 months from the date of informing successful applicants.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
IMI2 Research and Innovation Action (IMI2-RIA) and (IMI2-IA):
Summary of the most relevant provisions for participating in IMI2 actions
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
IMI2 Model Grant Agreement
MI2 Coordination and Support Action (IMI2-CSA):
Summary of the most relevant provisions for participating in IMI2 actions
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
IMI2 Model Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents:
IMI2 Call Fiche
IMI2 Work Plan
IMI JU derogation to H2020 Rules for Participation
[SESAR JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in Annex of the ad hoc financing decision.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the Annex of the ad hoc financing decision and part B of the General Annexes of the H2020 Work Programme.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the SJU proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in the Annex of the ad hoc financing decision and in the SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research: Call for Research Projects.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
For the applicable thresholds to this Exploratory Research Call for Proposals, please refer to point 3.1 above.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
Research and Innovation Action:
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in ad hoc financing decision
SJU proposal template
SJU evaluation form
SJU Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) . Please also refer to the document SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research: Call for Research Projects.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions and proposals must refer to measures envisaged.
SJU additional documents
SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research: Call for Research Projects
SJU Annual Work Programme
ATM Master Plan
Second draft of the SESAR 2020 R&I Programme ed. 0.21 dated 07 July 2014
Project Execution Guidance for SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research
[Shift2Rail JU calls – 2016 topic conditions template]
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in the Shift2Rail JU Work Plan.
Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in the Shift2Rail JU Work Plan.
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the standard proposal template.
Evaluation
3.1 Evaluation criteria, scoring and threshold: described in part F of the Shift2Rail JU Work Plan.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process and the Shift2Rail Guide for Applicants.
Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of single-stage evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
Information on the outcome of two-stage evaluation:
For stage 1: maximum 3 months from the deadline for submission.
For stage 2: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the stage 2 deadline for submission.
Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms:
Specific provisions and funding rates: described in
Research and Innovation Action (S2R-RIA):
Standard proposal template
Standard evaluation form
Shift2Rail Model Grant Agreement
H2020 Annotated Grant Agreement
Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Classified information
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – where a topic description foresees financial support to Third Parties, these provisions apply.
Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
Additional documents
Shift2Rail JU Annual Work Programme
Garantías:
No existen condiciones financieras para el beneficiario.
Información adicional de la convocatoria
Efecto incentivador:
Esta ayuda tiene efecto incentivador, por lo que el proyecto no puede haberse iniciado antes de la presentación de la solicitud de ayuda.
+ info.
Respuesta Organismo:
Se calcula que aproximadamente, la respuesta del organismo una vez tramitada la ayuda es de:
Meses de respuesta:
Muy Competitiva:
No conocemos el presupuesto total de la línea
Minimis:
Esta línea de financiación NO considera una “ayuda de minimis”.
Puedes consultar la normativa
aquí.
Otras ventajas
Sello PYME:
Tramitar esta ayuda con éxito permite conseguir el sello de calidad de “sello pyme innovadora”. Que permite ciertas ventajas fiscales.
NFRP-2014-2015
Education and training (Bologna and Copenhagen processes)
Scope:Specific challenge: One of the main goals of Euratom from its inception in developing research and training programmes is to maintain...
Sin info.
NFRP-2019-2020-13
Research roadmap for medical applications of ionising radiation
en consorcio:
Specific Challenge:Nuclear and ionising radiation technologies have a central place in modern medicine, saving lives and improving the quali...
Cerrada
hace 5 años
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
NFRP-2019-2020-14
Improving low-dose radiation risk appraisal in medicine
en consorcio:
Specific Challenge:Nowadays medical care extensively uses ionising radiation for diagnostic and therapy. Together with natural radiation, me...
Cerrada
hace 5 años
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
NFRP-2019-2020-10
Developing pre-disposal activities identified in the scope of the European Joint Programme in Radioactive Waste Management
en consorcio:
Specific Challenge:In Europe, the challenges in the field of radioactive waste management (RWM) include:
To improve, innovate and develop s...
Cerrada
hace 5 años
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
NFRP-2019-2020-03
Safety margins determination for design basis-exceeding external hazards
en consorcio:
Specific Challenge:EU nuclear plants need to demonstrate compliance with evolving and stringent safety requirements. These research actions...
Cerrada
hace 5 años
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
NFRP-2019-2020-05
Support for safety research of Small Modular Reactors
en consorcio:
Specific Challenge: Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are considered as a reasonable option to cover future energy needs and applications like e...
Cerrada
hace 5 años
| Próxima convocatoria prevista para el mes de
Ayudas Similares
CDTI CID
| Abierta
| Abierta
Programa Tecnológico Espacial...
| Próximamente
| Próximamente
CDTI CIEN
| Abierta
| Abierta