The Comparison of High Dose Heamodiafiltration HDF versus Haemodialyse
End stage kidney disease ranks among the most severe chronic non-communicable diseases with an unmet medical need, given the high (between 10 and 15%) and stable annual mortality rates. Kidney replacement therapy is necessary when...
ver más
¿Tienes un proyecto y buscas un partner? Gracias a nuestro motor inteligente podemos recomendarte los mejores socios y ponerte en contacto con ellos. Te lo explicamos en este video
Proyectos interesantes
ROAR
Role of endocycle in Acute Kidney Injury Response and Chroni...
171K€
Cerrado
RTC2019-007197-1
Desarrollo preclínico de una nueva terapia celular para el t...
283K€
Cerrado
SAF2014-59945-R
DIANAS DEPENDIENTES DE ANDROGENOS INVOLUCRADAS EN PROCESOS D...
230K€
Cerrado
EUIN2013-51079
RED EUROPEA PARA EL ESTUDIO DEL FRACASO RENAL AGUDO
13K€
Cerrado
STAR-T REK
Set up and comparison of multiple stem cell approaches for k...
4M€
Cerrado
RENALSTEM
Developing a stem cell based therapy to replace nephrons los...
168K€
Cerrado
Información proyecto CONVINCE
Duración del proyecto: 72 meses
Fecha Inicio: 2017-12-05
Fecha Fin: 2023-12-31
Fecha límite de participación
Sin fecha límite de participación.
Descripción del proyecto
End stage kidney disease ranks among the most severe chronic non-communicable diseases with an unmet medical need, given the high (between 10 and 15%) and stable annual mortality rates. Kidney replacement therapy is necessary when kidney function is below 10% of the normal value. Much effort is put into developing strategies to prevent chronic kidney disease progression. Regenerative medicine still is in the experimental phase and kidney transplantation is only available for a small number of patients. Indeed, the everyday reality is the growing number of dialysis patients. Haemodialysis treatment is the current standard of care for the vast majority of patients with end stage kidney disease. It is a substantial burden to the patient and for society. Haemodialysis treatment is associated with high risks for fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular disease, for infections, hospitalisation and low quality of life. Improvement in the currently available standard is urgently needed.
Over the past decade an alternative for haemodialysis became available, i.e. haemodiafiltration. Both are accepted by regulatory authorities. Haemodiafiltration removes waste products that are accumulated due to kidney failure, more effecticvely than standard hemodialysis. Present evidence supports the idea of superiority of haemodialfiltration compared to standard haemodialysis. However, definite proof is lacking and as a consequence haemodiafiltration is not yet widely applied.
This consortium aims to determine the best possible dialysis treatment by comparing the conventional guideline based haemodialysis treatment versus high-dose haemodiafiltration by carrying out a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial addressing clinical endpoints, quality of life and a cost-utility analysis. The study will deliver an answer on the question which intervention gives the best value for money. Therefore, it will be considered a land mark study, allowing to publish an end of discussion paper