Self-imposed restrictions: understanding why politicians adopt anticorruption policies
Corruption is a pressing global challenge, which imposes substantial costs on the lives of people and businesses, and undermines citizens’ trust in democratic institutions. Anticorruption reforms and political ethics regulation ha...
ver más
¿Tienes un proyecto y buscas un partner? Gracias a nuestro motor inteligente podemos recomendarte los mejores socios y ponerte en contacto con ellos. Te lo explicamos en este video
Proyectos interesantes
ANTICORRP
Anticorruption Policies Revisited. Global Trends and Europea...
11M€
Cerrado
CSO2016-78258-R
ACCION COLECTIVA Y CORRUPCION EN ESPAÑA. LIMITES Y POSIBILID...
45K€
Cerrado
DER2016-78563-P
CORRUPCION POLITICA: DE LA CONTABILIDAD IRREGULAR EN PROCESO...
57K€
Cerrado
GenCorr
A Genealogy of Corruption. Administrative Malpractice and Po...
163K€
Cerrado
RESPOND
RESPOND- Rescuing Democracy from Political Corruption in Dig...
6M€
Cerrado
MOCCA
Multilevel Orders of Corruption in Central Asia
2M€
Cerrado
Información proyecto SIR
Duración del proyecto: 23 meses
Fecha Inicio: 2024-09-01
Fecha Fin: 2026-08-31
Líder del proyecto
DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY
No se ha especificado una descripción o un objeto social para esta compañía.
TRL
4-5
Fecha límite de participación
Sin fecha límite de participación.
Descripción del proyecto
Corruption is a pressing global challenge, which imposes substantial costs on the lives of people and businesses, and undermines citizens’ trust in democratic institutions. Anticorruption reforms and political ethics regulation have also grown dramatically in European countries, but display varying degrees of success. While scandals, policy diffusion and political will have been advanced as explanations for the success or failure of anticorruption policies, it not yet understood under which specific conditions politicians will adopt anticorruption policies (ACPs) aimed at changing their own status quo and conduct. If we don’t know the answer to this question, then anti-corruption efforts are doomed to failure. Unlike previous studies that focused on the implementation of broad anticorruption reforms in the public sector or on the behaviour of participants acting out the part of policymakers in controlled laboratory experiments, the novelty of the SIR project is that it will investigate the specific conditions that surrounded the adoption of each anticorruption law aimed at political officials, namely party funding, conflict of interest and lobbying. The focus on policies will allow the research to go beyond simple national variations and grasp the conditions under which the policies were adopted in any given time. This research will be divided into two phases: i) the creation of an original database with the contextual conditions surrounding the adoption of ACPs and the adoption of GRECO recommendations in EU countries; ii) quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis of the contextual conditions surrounding the adoption of each specific ACPs dedicated to political office holders.