Security and the Politics of Belonging Homegrown terrorism counter radicalizat...
Security and the Politics of Belonging Homegrown terrorism counter radicalization and the end of multiculturalism?
What is the impact of counter-radicalization policies on multiculturalism and migrant membership in Europe? Many observers see state responses to homegrown terrorist threats as emphasizing assimilation in a way that marks the end...
ver más
¿Tienes un proyecto y buscas un partner? Gracias a nuestro motor inteligente podemos recomendarte los mejores socios y ponerte en contacto con ellos. Te lo explicamos en este video
Proyectos interesantes
GREASE
Radicalisation Secularism and the Governance of Religion B...
2M€
Cerrado
ARABSPRING
Long term developments in jihadi militant ideology and its t...
222K€
Cerrado
PRACTICIES
Partnership against violent radicalization in the cities
3M€
Cerrado
VORTEX
Coping with Varieties of Radicalization into Terrorism and E...
Cerrado
DRIVE
Determining multi level led causes and testing intervention...
3M€
Cerrado
PID2021-124617OB-I00
LO QUE APRENDI ESTANDO EN PRISION. PROFUNDIZAR EN LA NATURAL...
104K€
Cerrado
Información proyecto COUNTERADICAL
Líder del proyecto
UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN
No se ha especificado una descripción o un objeto social para esta compañía.
TRL
4-5
Presupuesto del proyecto
100K€
Fecha límite de participación
Sin fecha límite de participación.
Descripción del proyecto
What is the impact of counter-radicalization policies on multiculturalism and migrant membership in Europe? Many observers see state responses to homegrown terrorist threats as emphasizing assimilation in a way that marks the end of multiculturalism. This project argues instead that current anti-terror practices are producing an increased division of European societies along ethno-religious lines.
Media and political discourse in European countries have announced the end of multiculturalism. The main reason behind this backlash being the need of fighting homegrown terrorism, a danger understood as linked to diaspora ghettoization and ethnic and religious separateness. In this sense, counter-radicalization policies and practices should be at the vanguard of an assimilationist and anti-multiculturalist turn.
Yet is it the case? Several recent studies have shown that multicultural practices continue under different guises. Building on these findings, and through a comparison of Britain, France and the Netherlands, the project explores the hypothesis that counter-radicalization policies do not mark a return to assimilationist policies. Instead, through everyday practices of policing, they perpetuate and reinforce the ethno-religious division of national communities. The consequence of these policies is to remove fundamental questions about pluralism and citizenship from the political debate, casting them instead in the technical and depoliticized language of security.
The proposed research is based on a discourse analysis of policy documents, in-depth qualitative interviews and ethnographic observation.