Responsible prediction of gene expression: mitigating genetic risk profiling
Environmental factors are crucial to physical and mental health—they impact even the expression of our DNA. The study of epigenetics provides better understanding of gene-environment interaction. Environmental influence can come f...
ver más
30/04/2025
UANTWERPEN
176K€
Presupuesto del proyecto: 176K€
Líder del proyecto
UNIVERSITEIT ANTWERPEN
No se ha especificado una descripción o un objeto social para esta compañía.
TRL
4-5
Fecha límite participación
Sin fecha límite de participación.
Financiación
concedida
El organismo HORIZON EUROPE notifico la concesión del proyecto
el día 2023-03-28
¿Tienes un proyecto y buscas un partner? Gracias a nuestro motor inteligente podemos recomendarte los mejores socios y ponerte en contacto con ellos. Te lo explicamos en este video
Información proyecto PredicGenX
Duración del proyecto: 25 meses
Fecha Inicio: 2023-03-28
Fecha Fin: 2025-04-30
Líder del proyecto
UNIVERSITEIT ANTWERPEN
No se ha especificado una descripción o un objeto social para esta compañía.
TRL
4-5
Presupuesto del proyecto
176K€
Fecha límite de participación
Sin fecha límite de participación.
Descripción del proyecto
Environmental factors are crucial to physical and mental health—they impact even the expression of our DNA. The study of epigenetics provides better understanding of gene-environment interaction. Environmental influence can come from outside and inside the organism but one environmental factor that is typically overlooked is people’s knowledge production and beliefs. PredicGenX responds to the scientific worry that predictions about genes are likely to be reflexive i.e., they impact the eventual outcome. Scholars have raised concerns that beliefs about genetic information affects genetic risk to match that information—a so-called self-fulfilling prophecy not unlike the placebo and nocebo effects. Studies showed that receiving one’s genetic risk profile can change physiology independent of actual genetic risk. Moreover, the current trend to focus on risk, biomarkers, and early diagnostics produces 'knowledge' which is inevitably based on undetermined information, given that gene expression is not fixed. Asserting genetic information as determined when the assertion itself has potential impact on genetic expression is especially alarming considering the popularity of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and precision medicine. Understanding the direct impact of genetic predictions on gene-expression, its vulnerability to feedback loops, and their moral implications is crucial, urgent, yet currently lacking. With this project, I aim to fill that knowledge gap. Through qualitative fieldwork and philosophical analysis, I will theorise the different ways in which reflexive (epi)genetic prediction manifests and—while detailing a descriptive account of the different models—offer an analysis of the epistemic and ethical implications of their reflexivity on research and practice, and the meaning for therapeutic intervention.