Global Migration Justice: Beyond conflicting approaches to migration in internat...
Global Migration Justice: Beyond conflicting approaches to migration in international human rights law
MIGJUST addresses the unacknowledged, fundamental conflict between the European Court of Human Rights, which in its migration case law adopts a sovereignty approach normalising sedentarism, and the Inter-American and African human...
ver más
¿Tienes un proyecto y buscas un partner? Gracias a nuestro motor inteligente podemos recomendarte los mejores socios y ponerte en contacto con ellos. Te lo explicamos en este video
Proyectos interesantes
DER2009-13679
LA DIMENSION EXTERIOR DEL ESPACIO DE LIBERTAD, SEGURIDAD Y J...
54K€
Cerrado
LEGAPOLIS
Civil society and the mobilization of European human rights...
228K€
Cerrado
DER2016-75573-R
MOVILIDAD INTERNACIONAL DE PERSONAS: EL IMPACTO JURIDICO-SOC...
15K€
Cerrado
RTI2018-099097-B-I00
LA EXTERNALIZACION E INFORMALIZACION DE LAS POLITICAS DE INM...
19K€
Cerrado
HUBBOR
Human Rights Beyond Borders The extraterritorial applicatio...
1M€
Cerrado
MIGRINTERACT
Normative Interaction and Law Making Regulating Migration i...
270K€
Cerrado
Información proyecto MIGJUST
Duración del proyecto: 59 meses
Fecha Inicio: 2024-10-01
Fecha Fin: 2029-09-30
Líder del proyecto
UNIVERSITEIT GENT
No se ha especificado una descripción o un objeto social para esta compañía.
TRL
4-5
Presupuesto del proyecto
2M€
Fecha límite de participación
Sin fecha límite de participación.
Descripción del proyecto
MIGJUST addresses the unacknowledged, fundamental conflict between the European Court of Human Rights, which in its migration case law adopts a sovereignty approach normalising sedentarism, and the Inter-American and African human rights Commission and Court which adopt a human rights approach normalising mobility. This fragmentation of international law also plays out in UN human rights Committees. This fragmentation is not acknowledged in academic work, in which the European approach is assumed to represent the most advanced version of international law. This fragmentation is problematic because it undermines the international character of international law. Legal doctrine overlaps with political theory on migration justice, which focuses on Europe and North America, and does not acknowledge distinct positions developed in Latin American, African and Islamic political theory.MIGJUST ends the hypothesised bias not merely by including Inter-American, African and UN case law and acknowledging their distinct positions; but by in addition linking European, Inter-American, African and UN case law to political theory. MIGJUST will thus produce-a restatement of international human rights law doctrine in the field of migration which includes Inter-American, African and UN case law as well as European case law;-an analysis of the conflicting fundamental positions;-an analysis of how the conflict relates to divergent ideas on migration justice in European, North American, Latino, African and Islamic political theory;-legal doctrinal alternatives, inspired by non-ideal political and legal theory.In doing so, MIGJUST makes -a fundamental academic contribution by ending the assumed European bias; -a fundamental contribution to legal practice by unlocking Inter-American, African and UN case law;-a fundamental contribution to international cooperation between states, IOs and INGOs by making their varying normative positions understandable to each other.